Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

RITE AID CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
         
  (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
         
  (5) Total fee paid:
         

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
  (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
  (3) Filing Party:
         
  (4) Date Filed:
         

Table of Contents

LOGO

September 27, 2018June 7, 2019
Dear Fellow Stockholders:

        On behalf of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Rite Aid Corporation ("Rite Aid" or the "Company"), weI want to take this opportunity to invite you to attend our 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The meeting will be held at 8:30 a.m., local time, on Tuesday, October 30, 2018,Wednesday, July 17, 2019, at the New York Marriott Marquis, 1535 Broadway,office of Skadden, Arps, Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, Four Times Square, New York, NY 10036. At the meeting, stockholders will vote on the proposals set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting and the accompanying proxy statement.

        As a Board, our focus remainsAt Rite Aid, we remain focused on taking actions to best position Rite Aid for the long term in the face of the various industry, economic and company-specific challenges. Our top priorities include continuing to engage with our stockholders, executing on Rite Aid's strategic plan and creating long-term stockholder value. Rite Aid's network of conveniently located retail pharmacies, our EnvisionRxOptions Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM) company and our trusted brand of health and wellness offerings provide a strong foundationCompany to create long-term value for stockholders. These include actions to use our stockholders.unique capabilities to help payors deliver a high level of care to patients, to re-imagine our front end to offer the selection of products and services that meet the needs of our target customers and to transform our processes and procedures to ensure strong cost discipline and achieve peak operational efficiency.

        SinceOur actions to create long-term value for stockholders include our efforts to enhance the terminationquality of the Albertsons transaction, our Board has spearheaded a campaign toby bringing in fresh perspectives and valuable expertise and experience. A majority of Rite Aid directors have our independent directors engage with our stockholders. Independent directors and management together have reached out to 11 of our largest stockholders, owningjoined the Board in the aggregate approximately 38% of our shares, and independent directors have engaged directlypast eight months, with six of these stockholders to date, owning in the aggregate approximately 29% of our shares. In addition, management has communicated with many retail stockholders and received their feedback. We greatly value the insightful input about Rite Aid that our stockholders have provided in these and other exchanges.

        Based on the feedback we received, and consistent with our commitment to align Rite Aid's interests with those of our stockholders, we are making several changes to strengthen and enhance the Board's governance oversight. First, the Board has decided to separate the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Bruce G. Bodaken will hold the position of Chairman effective at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Board also has significantly accelerated its efforts to change the composition of the Board. As part of that refreshment process, three of our current eight independent directors will not be standing for re-election and we are nominating three new independent directors—Robert E.Bob Knowling, Jr., Louis P.Lou Miramontes and Arun Nayar. TheseNayar joining in October 2018 and Busy Burr and Kate Quinn joining in April 2019. In addition to their wealth of knowledge and experience, these changes willto our Board bring fresh perspectives to the opportunitiesa diversity of thought, as well as enhance our Board's gender, racial, and challenges before us. Our new director nominees, Bob, Lou and Arun, also bring public company experience, strategic planning skills and financial expertise to the Board. We are committed to continuing the Board refreshment process over the next year to ensureethnic diversity.

        As we have the right mix of experience, expertise and fresh perspectives to guide Rite Aid going forward.

        Onesaid previously, one of the Board's most important tasks is choosing the Company's Chief Executive Officer. After rigorousIn March, we announced a leadership transition and organizational restructuring to better align the structure and leadership of Rite Aid with its present scale. As part of this transition, we are currently in the process of searching for a new CEO. The Board recognizes the significance of this task and is conducting its process in a thoughtful evaluation and discussion,deliberate manner.

        Both before and since the 2018 Annual Meeting, we have increased our efforts to engage with many of our larger stockholders and we value the input they have provided. In response to votes held at the 2018 Annual Meeting and engagement thereafter, we have enhanced our corporate governance structures by requiring the separation of the Chairman of the Board firmly believesand CEO positions and by providing stockholders with the right to call special meetings.

        With respect to executive compensation, we took steps to further align pay and performance, including increasing the emphasis on performance-based (rather than time-based) long-term incentives for fiscal 2019 and refining our peer group for fiscal 2020 to, among other things, remove industry peers that John Standley is best situatedare no longer appropriate data points given their significantly larger scope of operations.

        We continue our efforts to serve asensure that Rite Aid's Chief Executive Officer.business is operated in a sustainable and socially responsible manner. In reaching this conclusion,addition to moving forward on the Board considered his extensive industry experiencesustainability and in-depth understanding of all aspects ofopioid-related reports that stockholders voted for at the Company,2018 Annual Meeting, in April 2019, we announced enhanced efforts to promote responsible access to tobacco products by increasing the age to purchase tobacco products to 21 and removing e-cigarettes and vaping products chain-wide. We are also continuing to enforce our chain-wide "ID All" policy that requires identification to purchase age-restricted items, including its customers, operations and key business drivers.tobacco products. The Board believes this experiencecontinues to receive reports from management on sustainability and understanding will be vital to navigating the Company through its current challenges and building stockholder value for the long term, as well as providing stability to the Company's many constituents.

        The Board also has been deeply involved in overseeing management's development of the strategic initiatives that the Company is undertaking to enhance stockholder value as a stand-alone company.opioid-related matters.


Table of Contents

These initiatives        As referenced above and described further in the accompanying proxy statement, we at Rite Aid have taken or are designed to capitalize on Rite Aid's valuable store and PBM businesses to grow revenues, improve efficiency and drive profitability. As partin the process of this effort,taking the actions that we are taking actions to drive prescription growth and front-end sales by working to expandsaid we would take—refreshing our access to preferred and limited networks, enhancing our pharmacy clinical capabilities to improve patient outcomes, leveraging our valuable Wellness brand, refining our merchandising efforts and expanding our omnichannel capabilities. Our actions also include expanding EnvisionRxOptions' Medicare Part D business, improving payor relations to stabilize reimbursement rate pressures, obtaining efficient generic drug pricing and continuing to control costs through a leaner, more efficient structure.

        As the Board, continues to oversee management's implementation of these strategic initiatives, it believes that Mr. Standley's knowledge and experience are critical to their successful execution. Going forward, our new Chairman, Mr. Bodaken, and our other independent directors will continue to evaluate Mr. Standley's performance in executing these strategic initiatives, and will work with Mr. Standley to review, evaluate and develop all levels of senior management.

        We view the governance changes described above as the first steps in reinvigorating our corporate governance practices and policies. Overpolicies, assessing management's performance, aligning pay for performance, overseeing the coming year, the Board will continuedevelopment of strategic initiatives, and being responsive to seek stockholder input and identify new candidates to further refresh the Board. We will also consider corporate governance enhancements, including addressing items specificallyissues raised by stockholders in the course of our recent and ongoing engagement efforts. The attached proxy statement contains additional information concerning topics raised by some of our stockholders in the course of that engagement and our review of additional corporate governance changes.stockholders. We look forward to continuing to engage with you.

        Your vote is important to us. Please vote as soon as possible even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. We appreciate your continued ownership of Rite Aid shares and your support.

  Sincerely,

 

 

The Continuing Independent Directors of
Rite Aid:
GRAPHICGRAPHICGRAPHIC

 
Joseph B. Anderson, Jr.

Bruce G. Bodaken
Kevin E. Lofton

GRAPHICChairman of the Board
GRAPHIC
Michael N. ReganMarcy Syms

   

Refer to the section titled "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" for a discussion of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.


Table of Contents

LOGO

RITE AID CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 3165
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17105



NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on October 30, 2018July 17, 2019

To Our Stockholders:

What:

 Our 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

When:

 

October 30, 2018July 17, 2019 at 8:30 a.m., local time

Where:

 

New York Marriott Marquis,Office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
1535 Broadway,Four Times Square
New York, NY 10036

Why:

 

At this Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to:

   

1.

 

Elect nineeight directors to hold office until the 20192020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

   2. Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm;

   3. Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as presented in the proxy statement;

   4. Consider and vote on threea stockholder proposals,proposal, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and

   5. Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

        The close of business on September 10, 2018June 6, 2019 has been fixed as the record date for determining those Rite Aid stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date will receive this notice of, and be eligible to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. The above items of business for the Annual Meeting are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice.

        Your vote is important.    Please read the proxy statement and the instructions on the enclosed proxy card and then, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, and no matter how many shares you own, please submit your proxy promptly by telephone or via the Internet in accordance with the instructions on the enclosed proxy card, or by completing, dating and returning your proxy card in the envelope provided. This will not prevent you from voting in person at the Annual Meeting. It will, however, help to assure a quorum and to avoid added proxy solicitation costs.

        You may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken by delivering to the Secretary of Rite Aid a written revocation or a proxy with a later date (including a proxy by telephone or via the Internet) or by voting your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, in which case your prior proxy would be disregarded.

 By order of the Board of Directors

 

 

GRAPHIC

 

James J. Comitale
Secretary
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
September 27, 2018June 7, 2019


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 Page 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

  1 

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, MANAGEMENT TRANSITION, AND BOARD REFRESHMENT

  7 

PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  109 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  109 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 20182019

  2425 

PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

  2526 

PROPOSAL NO. 3 ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  2627 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALSPROPOSAL

  2728 

PROPOSAL NO. 4 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL—INDEPENDENT CHAIRMANSEEKING A BY-LAW AMENDMENT FOR A 10% OWNERSHIP THRESHOLD FOR STOCKHOLDERS TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS

  2728 

PROPOSAL NO. 5 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL—SUSTAINABILITY REPORT

29

PROPOSAL NO. 6 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL—REPORT ON GOVERNANCE MEASURES RELATED TO OPIOIDSEXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  31 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

35

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  3633 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

  3633 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

  5453 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

  5554 

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 20182019

  5755 

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND SEPARATION AGREEMENTS

  5856 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR 20182019 YEAR-END

  5957 

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 20182019

  6058 

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 20182019

  6058 

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

  6058 

PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

  6665 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

  67 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

  69 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

  7069 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

  7170 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

  7271 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

  7372 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20192020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

  73 

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

  7574 

OTHER MATTERS

  7574 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING DELIVERY OF STOCKHOLDER DOCUMENTS

  7574 

ANNUAL REPORT

  7675 

APPENDIX A

  A-1 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    

i


Table of Contents

LOGO

RITE AID CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 3165
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17105



PROXY STATEMENT



FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on October 30, 2018July 17, 2019



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Stockholder Meeting to be Held on October 30, 2018:July 17, 2019:

The proxy statement and annual report, as well as the Company's proxy card, are available at
www.proxyvote.com.



        This proxy statement is being furnished to you by the Board of Directors (the "Board" or "Board of Directors") of Rite Aid Corporation (the "Company" or "Rite Aid") to solicit your proxy to vote your shares at our 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting"). The Annual Meeting will be held on October 30, 2018July 17, 2019 at 8:30 a.m., local time, at the New York Marriott Marquis, 1535 Broadway,office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Four Times Square, New York, NY 10036.

        This proxy statement, the foregoing notice and the accompanying proxy card are first being mailed on or about September 27, 2018June 7, 2019 to all holders of our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At Rite Aid and in this proxy statement, we refer to our employees as associates.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

        Holders of Rite Aid common stock as of the close of business on the record date, September 10, 2018,June 6, 2019, will receive notice of, and be eligible to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the record date, Rite Aid had outstanding and entitled to vote 1,065,434,68253,828,701 shares of common stock. No other shares of Rite Aid capital stock are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

        There are sixfour proposals that are scheduled to be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting:


Table of Contents

        Stockholders will also be asked to consider and vote at the Annual Meeting on any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. At this time, the Board of Directors is unaware of any matters, other than those set forth above, and the possible submission of the Weiss Proposal, as described in the section entitled "Other Matters," that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

What are the Board's voting recommendations?

        The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the nominees of the Board in the election of directors, "FOR" the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, "FOR" the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as presented in this proxy statement, and "AGAINST" each of the stockholder proposals.proposal.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

        If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Broadridge Corporate Issuer Services, you are considered the "stockholder of record" with respect to those shares.

        If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, those shares are held in "street name" and you are considered the "beneficial owner" of the shares. As the beneficial owner of those shares, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or nominee how to vote your shares, and you will receive separate instructions from your broker, bank, or other holder of record describing how to vote your shares.

How can I vote my shares before the Annual Meeting?

        If you hold your shares in your own name, you may submit a proxy by telephone, via the Internet, or by mail.

        By casting your vote in any of the three ways listed above, you are authorizing the individuals listed on the proxy to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. You may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.


Table of Contents

        If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, or other nominee, you will receive instructions from the holder of record that you must follow for your shares to be voted. The availability of telephonic or Internet voting will depend on the bank's, broker's, or broker'sother nominee's voting process. Please check with your bank, broker, or brokerother nominee and follow the voting procedures your bank, broker, or brokerother nominee provides to vote your shares. Also, please note that if the holder of record of


Table of Contents

your shares is a bank, broker, or other nominee and you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must request a legal proxy from your bank, broker, or other nominee that holds your shares and present that proxy and proof of identification at the Annual Meeting; otherwise, you will not be able to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

If I am the beneficial owner of shares held in "street name" by my broker, will my broker automatically vote my shares for me?

        New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") rules applicable to brokers grant your broker discretionary authority to vote your shares without receiving your instructions on certain matters. Your broker has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, unless you provide voting instructions to your broker, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors, the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, and the vote on the stockholder proposals.proposal.Accordingly, it is particularly important that beneficial owners instruct their brokers how they wish to vote their shares.

How will my shares be voted if I give my proxy but do not specify how my shares should be voted?

        If you provide specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. If you hold shares in your name and sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted "FOR" the nominees of the Board in the election of directors, "FOR" the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, "FOR" the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, and "AGAINST" each of the stockholder proposals.proposal.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

        At this time, we are unaware of any matters, other than those set forth above, and the possible submission of the Weiss Proposal, as described in the section entitled "Other Matters," that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy, or their duly constituted substitutes acting at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, will be deemed authorized to vote or otherwise act on such matters in accordance with their judgment.

Who may attend the Annual Meeting?

        All stockholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Persons who are not stockholders may attend only if invited by the Board of Directors. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in the name of your broker, bank, or other nominee, you must bring proof of ownership (e.g., a current broker's statement) in order to be admitted to the meeting. You can obtain directions to the Annual Meeting by contacting our Investor Relations Department at (717) 975-3710.

Can I vote in person at the Annual Meeting?

        Yes. If you hold shares in your own name as a stockholder of record, you may come to the Annual Meeting and cast your vote at the meeting by properly completing and submitting a ballot.If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in the name of your broker, bank, or other nominee, you must first obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee giving you the right to vote those shares


Table of Contents

and submit that proxy along with a properly completed ballot at the meeting; otherwise, you will not be able to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.


Table of Contents

How can I change my vote?

        You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by:

        Any written notice of revocation, or later dated proxy, should be delivered to:

Rite Aid Corporation
30 Hunter Lane
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
Attention: James J. Comitale, Secretary

        Alternatively, you may hand deliver a written revocation notice, or a later dated proxy, to the Secretary at the Annual Meeting before we begin voting.

        If your shares of Rite Aid common stock are held by a bank, broker, or other nominee, you must follow the instructions provided by the bank, broker, or other nominee if you wish to change your vote.

What is an "abstention" and how would it affect the vote?

        An "abstention" occurs when a stockholder sends in a proxy with explicit instructions to decline to vote regarding a particular matter. Abstentions are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. An abstention with respect to the election of directors is neither a vote cast "for" a nominee nor a vote cast "against" the nominee and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Abstentions with respect to the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, the advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers, and the vote on the stockholder proposalsproposal will have the same effect as voting "against" the proposal.

What is a broker "non-vote" and how would it affect the vote?

        A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee who holds shares for the beneficial owner is unable to vote those shares for the beneficial owner because the broker or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power for the proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Brokers will have discretionary voting power to vote shares for which no voting instructions have been provided by the beneficial owner only with respect to the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Brokers will not have such discretionary voting power to vote shares with respect to the election of directors, the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, and the vote on the stockholder proposals.proposal. Shares that are the subject of a broker non-vote are included for quorum purposes, but a broker non-vote with respect to a proposal will not be counted as a vote cast and will not be counted as a vote represented at the meeting and entitled to vote and, consequently, will have no effect on the


Table of Contents

outcome of the vote. Accordingly, it is particularly important that beneficial owners of Rite Aid shares instruct their brokers how to vote their shares.


Table of Contents

What are the quorum and voting requirements for the proposals?

        In deciding the proposals that are scheduled for a vote at the Annual Meeting, each holder of common stock as of the record date is entitled to one vote per share of common stock. In order to take action on the proposals, a quorum, consisting of the holders of 532,717,34226,914,351 shares (a majority of the aggregate number of shares of Rite Aid common stock) issued and outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date for the Annual Meeting, must be present in person or by proxy. This is referred to as a "quorum." Proxies marked "Abstain" and broker non-votes will be treated as shares that are present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of votes cast is required for the election of each director nominee named in Proposal No. 1. This means that the votes cast "for" that nominee must exceed the votes cast "against" that nominee. Any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. For more information on the operation of our majority voting standard, see the section entitled "Board of Directors—Corporate Governance—Majority Voting Standard and Policy."

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm in Proposal No. 2. Any shares represented and entitled to vote at the meeting and not voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote "against" the proposal.

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the approval of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers in Proposal No. 3. Any shares represented and entitled to vote at the meeting and not voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote "against" the proposal. Any broker non-votes with respect to the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will not be counted as shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote and, consequently, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the approval of each of the stockholder proposalsproposal in Proposal No. 4, Proposal No. 5 and Proposal No. 6.4. Any shares represented and entitled to vote at the meeting and not voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote "against" the stockholder proposals.proposal. Any broker non-votes with respect to the stockholder proposalsproposal will not be counted as shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote and, consequently, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

What happens if a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting?

        If the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting are not sufficient to constitute a quorum, the stockholders by a vote of the holders of a majority of votes present in person or represented by proxy (which may be voted by the proxyholders) may, without further notice to any


Table of Contents

stockholder (unless a new record date is set), adjourn the meeting to a different time and place to permit further solicitations of proxies sufficient to constitute a quorum.


Table of Contents

Who will count the votes?

        Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will tabulate the votes and act as inspectors of election.

Who will conduct the proxy solicitation and how much will it cost?

        We are soliciting proxies from stockholders on behalf of our Board and will pay for all costs incurred by it in connection with the solicitation. In addition to solicitation by mail, the directors, officers and associates of Rite Aid and its subsidiaries may solicit proxies from stockholders of Rite Aid in person or by telephone, facsimile, or email without additional compensation other than reimbursement for their actual expenses.

        We have retained Morrow Sodali, LLC, a proxy solicitation firm, to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. Rite Aid will pay Morrow Sodali a fee of approximately $20,000, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

        Arrangements also will be made with brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation material to the beneficial owners of stock held of record by such persons, and we will reimburse such custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the forwarding of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of our stock.

        If you have any questions about voting your shares or attending the Annual Meeting, please call our Investor Relations Department at (717) 975-3710.


Table of Contents


STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, MANAGEMENT TRANSITION, AND BOARD REFRESHMENT

        FollowingSince the termination of the Albertsons transaction in August 2018 and following the 2018 Annual Meeting, we have engaged in enhanced stockholder outreach efforts. Our independent directors and management together have reached out to 11 of our largest stockholders, owning in the aggregate approximately 38% of Rite Aid shares, and independent directors have engaged directly with six of these stockholders to date, owning in the aggregate approximately 29% of Rite Aid shares. These efforts provided an opportunity for independent directors to hear from stockholders directly regarding their perspectives and concerns. In addition, management has communicated with many retail stockholders and received their feedback. We greatly value the insightful input about the Company that our stockholders have provided in these and other exchanges.exchanges over the past ten months. The feedback from these efforts washas been summarized, shared, and considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee and the full Board.

        Investors raised a number of concerns and the Board has taken significant steps to address these items, with more work to be done.items. Specifically, the principal issues raised by our stockholders related to: (1) Board refreshment, (2) an evaluation of management, (3) corporate governance matters, and (4) the Company's sustainability efforts.

New Board Leadership and Composition

        In the course of our stockholder engagement meetings over the past ten months, stockholders expressed concerns regarding the lack of Board refreshment in recent years, as well as concerns regarding our Board governance. The Board has reviewed its structure in light of the Company's current operating and governance environment and, determined that, effective at the 2018 Annual Meeting, Mr. Standley will bewas succeeded as Chairman of the Board by Bruce G. Bodaken. TheSubsequently, in December 2018, the Board believesamended the Company's By-Laws to provide that Mr. Bodaken will provide excellent leadershipthe Chairman of the Board in his role as Chairman. Mr. Bodaken brings toshall be a director who is independent under the position in-depth knowledge ofNYSE listing standards and the health insurance and managed care industries and more than 20 years of executive leadership skills. Moreover, theCompany's Corporate Governance Guidelines.

        The Board has significantly accelerated its efforts to change the composition of the Board. As part of this process, at the 2018 Annual Meeting, three of the current eight independent directors aredid not standingstand for re-electionreelection and the Board has nominated three new independent directors. Robert E. Knowling, Jr., Louis P. Miramontes and Arun NayarAs a continuation of this process, two new directors were appointed by the Board following the resignation of two of our directors in April 2019. The five directors who have joined the Board over the past eight months will continue to bring fresh perspectives to the Board, as well as public company experience, strategic planning skills and financial expertise.Board. In addition, Mr. Standley has not been nominated for reelection at the Annual Meeting.

        The Board sought to balance the need for new perspectives while retaining the benefit of current members' deep understanding of the Company's business, strategy and challenges. The Board also considered current directors' time availability in light of their other business commitments.        As a result of these changes in the Board's composition, the average tenure of our independent directors will decreasehas decreased from approximately eight years prior to the 2018 Annual Meeting to approximately sixfour years, with a relatively even distribution among new directors directors of medium tenure and directors of longer tenure. Through the Board refreshment process, the Board will increasehas increased the racial and ethnic diversity on the Board, with a majorityhalf of the Board being racially and ethnically diverse.diverse following the Annual Meeting. The Board recognizes that its gender diversity will decrease in connection with this initial stage of refreshment and is committed to considering women candidates and makingalso made gender diversity a priority as part of its ongoingmost recent phase of its refreshment, resulting in the coming year.

        In the coursemore than one-third of this refreshment process, theour Board considered the fact that Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. exceeds the Board's retirement age and decided to waive this requirement for Mr. Anderson's nomination this year. Specifically, the Board concluded that, in light of the number of directors not standing for re-election and the number of new directors nominated for election atbeing women following the Annual Meeting, the Board would benefit from Mr. Anderson's continued service on the Board, as he would bring important experience and knowledge about the Company that would be beneficial as the new Board members continue to gain familiarity with Rite Aid's business. As the Board refreshment processMeeting.


Table of ContentsManagement Transition

continues over the next year, the Board does not anticipate waiving this requirement for Mr. Anderson beyond this Annual Meeting.

        Moving forward, the Board refreshment process will continue over the next year to ensure we have the right mix of experience, expertise and fresh perspectives to guide Rite Aid going forward. The Board recognizes that stockholders expect the initial steps we are taking this year in the refreshment process to be the beginning and not the end.

Evaluation of Management

        In the course of our recent engagement efforts, stockholders sought confirmation that the Board has considered and evaluated management.        One of the Board's most important tasks is choosing the Company's Chief Executive Officer. AfterFollowing the 2018 Annual Meeting, the Board continued to engage in rigorous and thoughtful evaluation and discussion regarding the Chief Executive Officer and other management positions. In March 2019, the Company announced a leadership transition and organizational restructuring to better align its structure with the Company's operations and to reduce costs. As part of the leadership transition, the Company announced that the Board has reaffirmed its strongly held belief that John Standley is best situated to serve as Rite Aid'swould be commencing a search process for a new Chief Executive Officer. In making this determination, the Board considered his extensive industry experience and in-depth understanding of all aspects of the Company, including its customers, operations and key business drivers. The Board believes this experience and understanding will be vital to navigating the Company through its current challenges and building stockholder value for the long term, as well as providing stability to the Company's many constituents.

        Our mission is to improve the health and wellness of our communities through engaging experiences that provide our customers with the best products, services and advice to meet their unique needs. To achieve this mission, we are focused on three strategic priorities: serving as the trusted advisor of our pharmacy customers, providing our customers with a convenient and personalized shopping experience and building a winning value proposition for payors and providers.

        In order to achieve these priorities, the Board has been deeply involved in overseeing management's development and implementation of a number of strategic initiatives which are designed to capitalize on Rite Aid's valuable store and pharmacy benefit manager ("PBM") businesses to grow revenues, improve efficiency and drive profitability. This includes taking actions to drive prescription growth and front-end sales by working to expand our access to preferred and limited networks, enhancing our pharmacy clinical capabilities to improve patient outcomes, leveraging our valuable Wellness brand, refining our merchandising efforts and expanding our omnichannel capabilities. In addition, we are focused on expanding PBM EnvisionRxOptions' Medicare Part D business, improving payor relations to stabilize reimbursement rate pressures, obtaining efficient generic drug pricing and continuing to control costs through a leaner, more efficient structure.

        The Board believes that Mr. Standley's knowledge and experience are critical to moving forward quickly on these strategic initiatives, many of which are underway. Going forward, our new Chairman, Bruce G. Bodaken, and our other directors, all of whom are independent directors other than Mr. Standley will continue to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Board's ongoing role in evaluating Mr. Standley's performance in executing these strategic initiatives, and will work with Mr. StandleyCompany until the appointment of his successor but has not been nominated for reelection to review, evaluate and develop all levels of senior management.

Additional Corporate Governance Changes

        Over the coming year, the Board plans to consider certain corporate governance practices, including items of discussion raised inat the course of our recent stockholder engagement efforts. The Board also will consider the Investor Stewardship Group Principles to determine whether other changes are appropriate as part of the effort to address stockholder concerns relating to corporate governance matters.

        The Board also will consider enhancements to its current oversight of the Company's environmental practices and sustainability efforts. The Company views sustainability business principles


Table of Contents

as partAnnual Meeting. The Company also announced additional management changes, which were effective in March 2019, and consolidated additional senior leadership roles that resulted in the elimination of our overall business strategy, andcertain positions.

Additional Corporate Governance Changes

        Since the 2018 Annual Meeting, the Board receives periodic updates fromhas considered and taken action with respect to certain corporate governance practices. In discussions with stockholders, some stockholders expressed a desire for Rite Aid stockholders to have the right to call a special meeting. In addition, our Nominating and Governance Committee has been monitoring trends and developments relating to special meeting rights. As a result of these discussions and trends, in April 2019, the Board amended the Company's management onBy-Laws to permit special meetings of the stockholders of the Company to be called by stockholders holding at least 20% of the Company's common stock.

        At the 2018 Annual Meeting, stockholders approved a proposal requesting that Rite Aid prepare a sustainability initiatives.report describing the Company's environmental, social and governance ("ESG") risks and opportunities. The Company anticipates that a report describing the Company's ESG risks and opportunities will be released prior to the Annual Meeting. Additional details regarding the Company's consideration of sustainability matters and the related business initiatives the Company has undertaken in recent years are described in the section entitled "Board of Directors—Sustainability."

        At the 2018 Annual Meeting, stockholders approved a proposal requesting that Rite Aid prepare a report describing the corporate governance changes the Company has implemented since 2012 to more effectively monitor and manage financial and reputational risks related to the opioid crisis. The BoardCompany anticipates continuing its stockholder engagement effortsthat a report describing the Company's approach to oversight of opioid matters will be released by October 1, 2019. Additional details regarding the Company's oversight of opioid matters and the related business initiatives the Company has undertaken in recent years are described in the coming year in order to ensure that it is receiving stockholder feedback as the Company continues to move forward. The processsection entitled "Board of enhancing our corporate governance and refreshing our Board has only just begun, and we plan to continue these efforts moving forward.Directors—Opioid Matter Oversight."


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

        Our By-Laws provide that the Board of Directors may be composed of up to 15 members, with the number to be fixed from time to time by the Board. The Board has fixed the number of directors at nine,eight effective as of the Annual Meeting, and there are nineeight nominees for director at our Annual Meeting.

Director Nominees

        The Board of Directors, based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, has nominated Joseph B. Anderson, Jr., Bruce G. Bodaken, Elizabeth 'Busy' Burr, Robert E. Knowling, Jr., Kevin E. Lofton, Louis P. Miramontes, Arun Nayar, Michael N. Regan, John T. StandleyKatherine Quinn, and Marcy Syms to be elected directors at the Annual Meeting. Other than Mr. Knowling, Mr. Miramontes and Mr. Nayar, eachEach of the nominees for director to be elected at the Annual Meeting currently serves as a director of the Company. In selecting Mr. AndersonStandley will continue to serve as a nominee,Chief Executive Officer of the Board considered Mr. Anderson's age voted to waiveCompany until the requirement that a nomineeappointment of his successor but has not yet reached the age of 72. Specifically, the Board concluded that, in light of the number of directors not standing for re-election and the number of new directorsbeen nominated for electionreelection at the Annual Meeting, the Board would benefit from Mr. Anderson's continued service on the Board, as he would bring important experience and knowledge about the Company's strategy and challenges that would be beneficial as the new Board members continue to gain familiarity with Rite Aid's business. As the Board refreshment process continues over the next year, the Board does not anticipate waiving this requirement for Mr. Anderson beyond this Annual Meeting.

        Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will hold office until the 20192020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

        If any nominee at the time of election is unable or unwilling to serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, and as a consequence thereof other nominees are designated, then the persons named in the proxy or their substitutes will have the discretion and authority to vote or to refrain from voting for other nominees in accordance with their judgment.


RECOMMENDATION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.


BOARD OF DIRECTORS

        The following table sets forth certain information as of September 10, 2018May 31, 2019 with respect to our director nominees. If elected, the term of each of the following persons will expire at the 20192020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Name
 Age Position with Rite Aid Year First
Became
Director
  Age Position with Rite Aid Year First
Became
Director
 
John T. Standley  55 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  2009 
Joseph B. Anderson, Jr.   75 Director  2005 
Bruce G. Bodaken  66 Director  2013   67 Chairman  2013 
Elizabeth 'Busy' Burr  57 Director  2019 
Robert E. Knowling, Jr.   63 Nominee     63 Director  2018 
Kevin E. Lofton  63 Director  2013   64 Director  2013 
Louis P. Miramontes  64 Nominee     64 Director  2018 
Arun Nayar  67 Nominee     68 Director  2018 
Michael N. Regan  70 Director  2007 
Katherine Quinn  54 Director  2019 
Marcy Syms  67 Director  2005   68 Director  2005 

Table of Contents

Board Composition

        The Board is committed to ensuring that it is composed of a highly capable and diverse group of directors who are well-equipped to oversee the success of the business and effectively represent the interests of stockholders. In addition, the Board believes that having directors with a mix ofboth longer and shorter tenures on the Board helps transition the knowledge of the more experienced directors while providing a broad, fresh set of perspectives and a Board with a diversity of experiences and viewpoints. As discussed in the section entitled "Stockholder Engagement, Management Transition, and Board Refreshment" above, the Board has significantly accelerated its efforts to change the composition of the Board. As part of this process, three current directors are not standing for re-election andBoard over the Board has nominated three new independent directors.past eight months. All of the nominees of the Board are independent directors, except for Mr. Standley.directors.

        As a result of these changes in the Board's composition, the average tenure of our independent directors will decreasehas decreased from approximately eight years prior to the 2018 Annual Meeting to approximately sixfour years, with a relatively even distribution among new directors directors of medium tenure and directors of longer tenure. In addition, a majorityhalf of the Board will be racially and ethnically diverse.diverse following the Annual Meeting. The Board recognizes that its gender diversity will decrease in connection with this initial stage of refreshment and is committed to considering women candidates and makingalso made gender diversity a priority as part of its ongoingmost recent phase of its refreshment, resulting in more than one-third of our Board being women following the coming year.Annual Meeting.

Director Tenure* Board Racial and Ethnic Diversity*

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

Board Gender Diversity*

GRAPHIC

*
The compositions depicted include calculations based on the assumption that Mr. Knowling, Mr. Miramontes and Mr. Nayar are elected to the Board ateffective following the Annual Meeting.

        In assessing Board composition and selecting and recruiting director candidates, the Board seeks to maintain an engaged, independent Board with broad experience and judgment that is committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers a wide range of factors, including the size of the Board, the experience and expertise of existing Board members, other positions the director candidate has held or holds (including other


Table of Contents

board memberships), and the candidate's independence. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into account a candidate's ability to contribute to the diversity of background and experience represented on the Board, and it reviews its effectiveness in balancing these considerations when assessing the composition of the Board. The Board and Nominating and Governance Committee will continue to evaluate the composition of the Board as a whole as part of its ongoing refreshment in the coming year.

        Prior toSince the 2018 Annual Meeting, the Nominating and Governance Committee sought to recruitcontinue the process of recruiting additional Board members whose qualifications align with the Company's refreshment process and long-term strategy. After considering a number of candidates and comprehensively reviewing these candidates' abilities and qualifications in sourcing candidates to fill the vacancies on the Board due to Joseph B. Anderson's and Michael N. Regan's resignations, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommended Mr. Knowling, Mr. MiramontesBusy Burr and Mr. NayarKatherine Quinn for electionappointment to the Board.


Table of Contents The Board appointed both candidates as directors in April 2019.

        The chart below summarizes the qualifications, attributes, and skills for each of our director nominees. The fact that we do not list a particular experience or qualification for a director nominee does not mean that nominee does not possess that particular experience or qualification.

Skills and Experience
 StandleyBodaken AndersonBodakenBurr Knowling Lofton Miramontes NyarNayar ReganQuinn Syms 

Current/Former CEO

  X  XX  X  X           X 

Management/Business Operations

  X  X  X  X  X  X  X  X X

Retail Industry

XX

Healthcare Industry

X     X             XX

Finance/AccountingHealthcare Industry

  X  X   XX

Finance/Accounting

X        X  X  X    

Board/Corporate Governance

X  X  X  X  X  X  X  X  X 

Director Biographies

        Following are the biographies for our director nominees, including information concerning the particular experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board to conclude that such person should serve on the Board:

        John T. Standley.    Mr. Standley, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has been Chairman of the Board since June 21, 2012, Chief Executive Officer since June 2010 and was President from September 2008 until June 2013. Mr. Standley served as the Chief Operating Officer from September 2008 until June 2010. He also served as a consultant to Rite Aid from July 2008 to September 2008. From August 2005 through December 2007, Mr. Standley served as Chief Executive Officer and was a member of the board of directors of Pathmark Stores, Inc. From June 2002 to August 2005, he served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Rite Aid and, in addition, in January 2004 was appointed Chief Financial Officer of Rite Aid. He had served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rite Aid from September 2000 to June 2002 and had served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rite Aid from December 1999 until September 2000. Mr. Standley served on the SUPERVALU INC. board of directors from May 2013 to July 2015 and on the board of directors of CarMax, Inc. from August 2017 to January 2018. Mr. Standley currently serves on the National Association of Chain Drug Stores' board of directors and is a member of the Board's Executive Committee.

        As the Company's Chief Executive Officer, with more than 30 years of retail, financial and executive experience, Mr. Standley brings to the Board an in-depth understanding of all aspects of the Company, including its customers, operations and key business drivers. In addition, his experience serving as a chief financial officer of a number of companies, including the Company, provides the Board with additional insights into financial and accounting matters relevant to the Company's operations.

        Joseph B. Anderson, Jr.    Mr. Anderson has been the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TAG Holdings, LLC, a manufacturing, service and technology business, since January 2002. Mr. Anderson was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Chivas Industries, LLC from 1994 to 2002. Mr. Anderson also served as a director of Meritor, Inc. until January 2017. Mr. Anderson previously served as a director of NV Energy Inc. until December 2013, Valassis Communications, Inc. until February 2014 and Quaker Chemical Corporation until May 2016.

        Mr. Anderson has a broad base of experience, including 20 years of chief executive officer experience at manufacturing, service and technology companies. From this experience, Mr. Anderson brings an array of skills, including in the areas of strategic, business and financial planning and corporate development. In addition, his service on the boards of directors of a number of publicly-


Table of Contents

traded companies provides the Board with insights into how boards at other companies have addressed issues similar to those faced by the Company.

        Bruce G. Bodaken.    Mr. Bodaken served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blue Shield of California from 2000 through 2012. Previously, Mr. Bodaken served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Blue Shield of California from 1995 to 2000, and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 to 1995. Prior to joining Blue Shield of California, Mr. Bodaken served as Senior Vice President and Associate Chief Operating Officer of F.H.P., Inc., a managed care provider, from 1990 to 1994 and held various positions at F.H.P. from 1980 to 1990. Currently, Mr. Bodaken sits on the board of WageWorks, Inc., and is a member of its audit committee. He is also a director and member of the Compensation Committee of iRhythm Technologies, Inc. and a Lecturer in the Department of Public Health at UC Berkeley.

        Mr. Bodaken brings to the Board in-depth knowledge of the health insurance and managed care industries and more than 20 years of executive leadership skills.

        Busy Burr.    Ms. Burr most recently served as the chief innovation officer and vice president of healthcare trend and innovation at Humana where she was responsible for driving the design, build and adoption of new product platforms in digital health, provider experience, and telemedicine to improve health outcomes, create superior member experiences, and improve health care costs. She also founded Humana's strategic investing practice, Humana Health Ventures. Prior to joining Humana in 2015, Ms. Burr was managing director of Citi Ventures and led large-scale business transformation efforts as the global head of Citi's Business Incubation Function-DesignWorks. Earlier in her career, Ms. Burr spent seven years in investment banking at Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse First Boston and previously served as vice president of global brand management at Gap, Inc. Ms. Burr holds an MBA


Table of Contents

from Stanford University and a bachelor's degree in Economics from Smith College. Ms. Burr serves on the Boards of Mr. Cooper Group and Satellite Healthcare and is a member of the Smith College Business Network Advisory Board.

        Ms. Burr brings to the Board extensive experience in the health industry, innovation, business strategy and brand management. Her experience and insights in these areas are directly relevant to the Company's business.

        Robert E. Knowling, Jr.    Mr. Knowling is currently Chairman of Eagles Landing Partners, which specializes in helping senior management formulate strategy, lead organizational transformations, and re-engineer businesses. Mr. Knowling also serves as an advisor-coach to chief executive officers. Mr. Knowling previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Telwares, a JP Morgan Chase/One Equity Partners Private Equity-owned company from 2005 to 2009. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Knowling was Chief Executive Officer of the New York City Leadership Academy, an independent nonprofit corporation created by Chancellor Joel I. Klein and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg that is chartered with developing the next generation of principals in the New York City public school system. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Knowling was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SimDesk Technologies, Inc. Prior to this, Mr. Knowling was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Covad Communications, a Warburg Pincus Private Equity backedEquity-backed start-up company. Mr. Knowling currently serves on the board of directors of Convergys Corporation, K12 Inc. and Roper Technologies Inc. Mr. Knowling previously served as a director of Convergys Corporation until 2018, Ariba, Inc. until 2012, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. until 2015, Hewlett-Packard Company until 2005, and The Immune Response Corporation until 2005.

        Mr. Knowling brings to the Board extensive experience in executive management and leadership roles, including experience leading companies through periods of high growth and organizational turnaround. In addition, his service on other boards of directors of a number of publicly-traded companies enables Mr. Knowling to share insights with the Board regarding corporate governance best practices.

        Kevin E. Lofton.    Mr. Lofton has served as thewas named Chief Executive Officer of Denver-basedChicago-based CommonSpirit Health ("CSH"), effective February 1, 2019. CSH is the result of a merger between Catholic Health Initiatives ("CHI"), a healthcare system operating and Dignity Health. With $29 billion in revenues, CSH is one of the full continuum of services from hospitals to homelargest health agencies nationwide since 2003delivery systems in the United States. Mr. Lofton joined CHI in 1998 and served as President and CEO of CHI from 2003 throughuntil January 2014.2019. Mr. Lofton previously served as Chief Executive Officer of the UAB Hospital in Birmingham and Howard University Hospital in Washington, D.C. Mr. Lofton is also a director and member of the audit and compensation committees of Gilead Sciences, Inc.

        Mr. Lofton brings to the Board an in-depth knowledge and understanding of the healthcare industry and valuable executive leadership skills from senior management and leadership roles in healthcare systems and hospitals.


Table of Contents

        Louis P. Miramontes.    Mr. Miramontes worked at KPMG LLP from 1976 to 2014, where he served in many leadership roles, including Managing Partner of the San Francisco office and Senior Partner for KPMG's Latin American region. Mr. Miramontes was also an audit partner directly involved with providing audit services to public and private companies, which included working with client boards of directors and audit committees regarding financial reporting, auditing matters, SEC compliance, and Sarbanes-Oxley regulations. Mr. Miramontes currently serves on the board of directors of Lithia Motors, Inc., one of the largest providers of personal transportation solutions in the U.S., and Oportun, Inc., a mission-driven financial services company.

        Mr. Miramontes brings to the Board extensive experience in accounting, financial reporting, and corporate governance. His experience as an audit partner provides useful insights into financial and regulatory matters relevant to the Company's business. His service as a member and chair


Table of audit committees provides the Board with leadership skills regarding the role and responsibilities of the audit committee function.Contents

        Arun Nayar.    Mr. Nayar retired in December 2015 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tyco International, a $10+ billion fire protection and security company, where he was responsible for managing the company's financial risks and overseeing its global finance functions, including its tax, treasury, mergers and acquisitions, audit, and investor relations teams. Mr. Nayar joined Tyco as Senior Vice President and Treasurer in 2008 and was also Chief Financial Officer of Tyco's ADT Worldwide. From 2010 until 2012, Mr. Nayar was Senior Vice President, Financial Planning & Analysis, Investor Relations, and Treasurer. Prior to joining Tyco, Mr. Nayar spent six years at PepsiCo, Inc., most recently as Chief Financial Officer of Global Operations and, before that, as Vice President and Assistant Treasurer—Corporate Finance. Mr. Nayar currently serves on the Board of Directors of Bemis Company, Inc., a manufacturer of packaging products, and TFI International Inc., a leader in the transportation and logistics industry. Bemis Company, Inc. has announced a combination with Amcor Limited and has announced that Mr. Nayar will be a member of the board of the combined company, Amcor plc, upon consummation of the transaction. Mr. Nayar is also a Senior Advisor to McKinsey & Company and to a private equity firm, BC Partners. He also serves as a board member of privately-held GFL Environmental, a BC Partners portfolio company.

        Mr. Nayar brings over 35 years of financial experience to the Board. His experience as a chief financial officer provides useful insights into operational and financial metrics relevant to the Company's business.

        Michael N. Regan.Katherine Quinn.    Since July 2017, Mr. ReganMs. Quinn has served as vice chairman and chief administrative officer of U.S. Bancorp since April 2017 and is responsible for leading human resources, strategy, and corporate affairs at the Executive Vice Presidentcompany. Ms. Quinn joined U.S. Bancorp in 2013 as executive vice president and Chief Financial Officer for Servco Pacific Inc.,chief strategy and reputation officer. Prior to joining U.S. Bancorp, Ms. Quinn most recently served as senior vice president and chief marketing officer at Anthem, a privately heldhealth benefits company, with significant interests in automobile distributionwhere she directed the company's marketing, customer communications, digital, customer experience, and retail dealerships in Hawaii and Australia, as well as interests in other business lines. From August 2014 to March 2017, Mr. Reganstrategies. She previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAnthem's vice president of Outrigger Enterprises Group, a privately held hospitality company. Prior to that, Mr. Regancorporate marketing. Earlier in her career, Ms. Quinn served as the Hold Separate Manager on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission, overseeing the Lumiere Place Casinochief marketing and Hotel and Four Seasons Hotel in St. Louis, Missouri from August 2013 through its sale in spring 2014 and prior to that as Chief Financial Officer of Indianapolis Downs LLC,strategy officer at a casino and horse track complex located near Indianapolis, Indiana during its bankruptcy from January 2012 through its sale in February 2013. From May 2007 through December 2011, Mr. Regan was a self-employed private equity investor. Prior thereto, Mr. Regan served as Chief Financial Officerdivision of The St. Joe Company,Hartford, following leadership roles in strategy and product development at CIGNA and PacifiCare Health Systems, respectively. Ms. Quinn earned an MBA from University of Phoenix and a major real estate development company based in Florida,bachelor's degree from November 2006Hunter College. In addition to May 2007. From 1997 to November 2006, he servedher role at U.S. Bancorp, Ms. Quinn presently serves as Senior Vice President, Finance and held various other positions with The St. Joe Company and was a member of the senior management team. Prior to joining The St. Joe Company, heBoard of Directors of Taylor Corporation and the Board of Trustees for both United Way U.S.A. and Fraser, a non-profit organization serving children and adults with special needs. She previously served in various financial management functions at Harrah's Entertainment from 1980 through 1997, including as Vice President and controller from 1991 to 1997.a member of the Board of Trustees for Minnesota Public Radio until May 2019.

        Mr. Regan's over 30 years of experience, including serving as a chief financial officer and as a senior vice president of finance, providesMs. Quinn brings to the Board with additional perspectives on financial, operationalextensive experience in business strategy, marketing, customer experience, and strategic planning,health benefits. Her experience and real estate mattersinsights in these areas are directly relevant to the Company.


Table of ContentsCompany's business.

        Marcy Syms.    Ms. Syms served as a director of Syms Corp, a chain of retail clothing stores, from 1983, when she was named President and COO, until 2012. Ms. Syms became CEO of Syms Corp in 1998 and was named Chair in 2010. In November 2011, Syms Corp and its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and ceased all retail operations. Ms. Syms is also a founding member of the board of directors of the Syms School of Business at Yeshiva University. Currently, Ms. Syms serves as President of the Sy Syms Foundation andFoundation. Ms. Syms served as Founder and President of the TPD Group LLC, a multi-generational succession planning company.company, from 2013 to 2018. Ms. Syms is also a member of the board of directors of Benco Dental.

        Ms. Syms brings to the Board over 18 years of experience as a chief executive officer of a chain of retail stores, including an array of skills in strategic planning, marketing, and human resources matters similar to those faced by the Company.


Table of Contents

Board Leadership

        Mr. Standley currently servesBodaken became Chairman of the Board effective at the 2018 Annual Meeting. The Board has determined that Mr. Bodaken will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Regan has served as our Lead Independent Director since 2011. As discussed in the section entitled "Stockholder Engagement and Board Refreshment" above,Board.

        In December 2018, the Board has determinedamended the Company's By-Laws to provide that effective as of the Annual Meeting, Mr. Standley will be succeeded as Chairman of the Board by Mr. Bodaken. References in this proxy statement to Mr. Standley's position as Chairman apply only toshall be a director who is independent under the period prior toNYSE listing standards and the Annual Meeting.

        The Company's governance framework provides the Board with flexibility to select the appropriate leadership structure for the Company.Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board has no policy mandating the combination orbelieves that separation of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer positions and believes that, given the dynamic and competitive environment in which we operate, the right leadership structure may vary from time to time based on changes in circumstances. The Board makes this determination based on what it believes best serves the needs of the Company and its stockholders at any particular time.stockholders. The Board believes that Mr. Bodaken will continue to provide excellent independent leadership of the Board in his role as Chairman.

        The Board expects that, asAs Chairman, Mr. Bodaken's responsibilities will subsume the responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director and will include:


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance

        We recognize that good corporate governance is an important means of protecting the interests of our stockholders, associates, customers, suppliers, and the community. The Board of Directors, through the Nominating and Governance Committee, monitors corporate governance developments and proposed legislative, regulatory, and stock exchange corporate governance reforms. In April 2019, the Board enhanced our corporate governance by amending the Company's By-Laws to permit special meetings of stockholders of the Company to be called by stockholders holding at least 20% of the Company's common stock.

        Website Access to Corporate Governance Materials.    Our corporate governance information and materials, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, current charters for each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee, and Executive Committee, our Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers, our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, our Stock Ownership Guidelines, and our Related Person Transaction Policy are posted on our website atwww.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance" and are available in print upon request to Rite Aid Corporation, 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, Attention: Secretary. The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed, a part of this proxy statement. The Board regularly reviews corporate governance developments and will modify these materials and practices from time to time as warranted.


Table of Contents

        Codes of Ethics.    The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics that is applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The Board has also adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all of our officers, directors, and associates. Any amendment to either code or any waiver of either code for executive officers or directors will be disclosed promptly on our website atwww.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Code of Ethics."

        Director Independence.    For a director to be considered independent under the NYSE corporate governance listing standards, the Board of Directors must affirmatively determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company, including any of the relationships specifically proscribed by the NYSE independence standards. The Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in making its independence determinations. Only independent directors may serve on our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee.

        As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the following directors, including each director serving on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee, satisfy the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards: Joseph B. Anderson, Jr., Bruce G. Bodaken, David R. Jessick,Busy Burr, Robert E. Knowling, Jr., Kevin E. Lofton, Myrtle Potter, Michael N. Regan, Frank A. SavageLouis P. Miramontes, Arun Nayar, Katherine Quinn, and Marcy Syms. The Board also determined that Robert E. Knowling, Jr., Louis P. MiramontesJoseph B. Anderson and Arun Nayar satisfyMichael N. Regan, who served as directors until April 2019, and David R. Jessick, Myrtle Potter, and Frank A. Savage, who served as directors until October 30, 2018, also satisfied the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards. The Board also determined that the members of the Audit Committee satisfy the additional independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and the additional NYSE independence requirements for audit committee members. In addition, the Board has determined that the members of the Compensation Committee satisfy the additional NYSE independence requirements for compensation committee members.

        There is no family relationship between any of the nominees and executive officers of Rite Aid.

        Majority Voting Standard and Policy.    Under the Company's By-Laws, a nominee for director in uncontested elections of directors (as is the case for this Annual Meeting) will be elected to the Board if the votes cast "for" such nominee's election exceed the votes cast "against" such nominee's election. In contested elections, directors will be elected by a plurality of votes cast. For this purpose, a contested election means any meeting of stockholders for which (i) the Secretary of the Company receives a notice that a stockholder (or group of stockholders) has nominated a person for election to the Board in compliance with the advance notice requirements for stockholder nominees for director or


Table of Contents

the proxy access requirements, in each case as set forth in the By-Laws and (ii) such nomination has not been withdrawn by such stockholder (or group of stockholders) on or prior to the 14th day preceding the date the Company first mails its notice of meeting for such meeting to the stockholders.

        Under the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director who fails to receive the required number of votes for re-electionreelection in accordance with the By-Laws will, within five days following certification of the stockholder vote, tender his or her written resignation to the Chairman of the Board for consideration by the Board, subject to the procedures set forth in the guidelines.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

        The Board of Directors, as a whole and through the various committees of the Board, oversees the Company's management of risk, focusing primarily on five areas of risk: operational, financial performance, financial reporting, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational.

        Management of the Company is responsible for developing and implementing the Company's plans and processes for risk management. The Board believes that its leadership structure, described above,


Table of Contents

supports the risk oversight function of the Board. The Board of Directors, at least annually, reviews with management its plans and processes for managing risk. The Board also receives periodic updates from the Company's compliance and internal assurance services with regard to the overall effectiveness of the Company's risk management program and significant areas of risk to the Company, focusing on the five primary areas of risk set forth above as well as other areas of risk identified from time to time by either the Board, a Board committee, or management.

        In addition, the Board and the Audit Committee receive periodic updates from the Company's Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief AdministrativeInformation Officer, or Chief Information Security Officer on cybersecurity matters, including information services security and security controls over credit card, customer, associate, and patient data. These updates also include information regarding the Rite Aid Information Security Program, managed by Rite Aid's Chief Information Security Officer, which is designed to protect information and critical resources from a wide range of threats in order to ensure business continuity, minimize business risk and maximize return on investments and business opportunities. The objective in the development and implementation of the Information Security Program is to create effective administrative, technical and physical safeguards in order to protect the data of Rite Aid and its subsidiaries and the data of any clients of these entities.

        In addition, other Board committees consider risks within their respective areas of responsibility and advise the Board of any significant risks. For example, the Compensation Committee considers risks relating to the Company's compensation programs and policies and the Audit Committee focuses on assessing and mitigating financial reporting risks, including risks related to internal control over financial reporting and legal and compliance risks.

Compensation-Related Risk Assessment

        The Compensation Committee reviews all incentive plans relative to established criteria and conducts an assessment to ensure that none of our incentive plans encourage excessive risk-taking by our executives or associates. Together with executive management, the Compensation Committee has considered the risks arising from the Company's compensation programs for its executives and associates and has concluded that the compensation policies are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

        The Compensation Committee reviews the risk profile and the relationship between the Company's compensation programs to the overall risk profile of the Company. Some of the features of our incentive programs that limit risk include:


Table of Contents

Committees of the Board of Directors

        The Board of Directors has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Executive Committee. Current copies of the charters for each of these committees are available on our website atwww.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Corporate Governance Committees—Committee Charters."


Table of Contents

        The current members of the committees are identified in the following table.

Director
 Audit Compensation Nominating and
Governance
 Executive
Bruce G. BodakenXChair
Busy BurrX
Robert E. Knowling, Jr. Chair
Kevin E. LoftonChair
Louis P. MiramontesChairX
Arun NayarXX
Katherine QuinnX
John T. Standley       ChairX
Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. Chair
Bruce G. BodakenX
David R. JessickChairMarcy Syms     X
Kevin E. LoftonX
Myrtle PotterX
Michael N. ReganXXX
Frank A. SavageX
Marcy SymsChair  

        Audit Committee.    The Audit Committee, which held eightnine meetings during fiscal year 2018,2019, currently consists of David R. JessickLouis P. Miramontes (Chair), Kevin E. LoftonBusy Burr, and Michael N. Regan.Arun Nayar. The Board has determined that each of these individuals is an independent director under the NYSE listing standards and satisfies the additional independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the additional requirements of the NYSE listing standards for audit committee members. See the section entitled "Corporate Governance—Director Independence" above. The Board has determined that each of these individuals is also "financially literate" under the applicable NYSE listing standards. The Board has determined that David R. Jessick qualifiesboth Louis P. Miramontes and Arun Nayar qualify as an "audit committee financial expert" as that term is defined under applicable SEC rules.

        The functions of the Audit Committee include the following:

        The independent auditors and internal auditors meet with the Audit Committee with and without the presence of management representatives. For additional information, see the section entitled "Audit Committee Report," as well as the Audit Committee's charter, which is posted on our website atwww.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Corporate Governance Committees—Committee Charters."

        Compensation Committee.    The Compensation Committee, which held sixfour meetings during fiscal year 2018,2019, currently consists of Marcy SymsRobert E. Knowling, Jr. (Chair), Bruce G. BodakenLouis P. Miramontes, and Michael N. Regan.Katherine Quinn. The Board has determined that each of these individuals is an independent director under the NYSE listing standards and satisfies the additional independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards for compensation committee members. See the section entitled "Corporate Governance—Director Independence" above.


Table of Contents

        The functions of the Compensation Committee include the following:


Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of the Company's executive personnel, including the Company's named executive officers, and develops and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to executive compensation policies. The Compensation Committee is empowered by the Board of Directors to award to executive officers appropriate bonuses, stock options, stock appreciation rights, and stock-based awards. The details of the processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of the compensation of our named executive officers are described in the section entitled "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis." The objectives of the Compensation Committee are to support the achievement of desired Company performance, to provide compensation and benefits that will attract and retain superior talent, to reward performance, and to fix a portion of compensation to the outcome of the Company's performance.

        As provided in its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to engage an external compensation consultant and to determine the scope of any services provided. The Compensation Committee may terminate the engagement at any time. The external compensation consultant reports to the Compensation Committee Chair.

        Since June 2010, the Compensation Committee has utilized Exequity LLP as its independent consultant. With respect to fiscal year 2018,2019, Exequity LLP reviewed recommendations and analysis prepared by management and provided advice and counsel to the Compensation Committee. Exequity LLP does not provide any other services to the Company. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Exequity LLP, taking into consideration the factors set forth in the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules, and determined that the engagement of Exequity LLP does not raise any conflicts of interest.

        Nominating and Governance Committee.    The Nominating and Governance Committee, which held one meetingeight meetings during fiscal year 2018,2019, currently consists of Joseph B. Anderson, Jr.Kevin Lofton (Chair), Myrtle PotterBruce G. Bodaken, and Frank A. Savage.Marcy Syms. The Board has determined that each of these individuals is an independent director under the NYSE listing standards. See the section entitled "Corporate Governance—Director Independence" above.

        The functions of the Nominating and Governance Committee include the following:


Table of Contents


Table of Contents

        Executive Committee.    The members of the Executive Committee currently are Bruce G. Bodaken (Chair), Arun Nayar, and John T. Standley (Chair), David R. Jessick and Michael N. Regan.Standley. The Executive Committee did not meet during fiscal year 2018.2019. The Executive Committee, except as limited by Delaware law, is empowered to exercise all of the powers of the Board of Directors.

Nomination of Directors

        The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. In considering such recommendations, the Nominating and Governance Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board and the qualifications of the candidate. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also take into consideration the number of shares held by the recommending stockholder and the length of time that such shares have been held. To have a candidate considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee, a stockholder must submit the recommendation in writing and must include the following information:

        The stockholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to Rite Aid Corporation, 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, Attention: Secretary. The Nominating and Governance Committee will accept recommendations of director candidates throughout the year. Generally, in order for a recommended director candidate to be considered for nomination to stand for election at an upcoming annual meeting of stockholders, the recommendation must be received by the Secretary not fewer than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of Rite Aid's most recent annual meeting of stockholders. In the event an annual meeting is held on a date that is not within 25 days of such anniversary date, recommendations will be considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee in due course.

        The Board seeks to maintain an engaged, independent Board with broad experience and judgment that is committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the minimum qualifications for serving as a Rite Aid director are that a candidate demonstrate, by significant accomplishment in his or her field, an ability to make a meaningful contribution to the Board's oversight of Rite Aid's business and affairs and have an impeccable record and reputation for honest and ethical conduct in his or her professional and personal activities. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee examines a candidate's specific experiences and skills, availability in light of other commitments, potential conflicts of interest, and independence from management and the Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee also seekstakes into account a candidate's ability to havecontribute to the Board represent a diversity of backgroundsbackground and experience.experience represented by the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee assesses its achievement of diversity through the review of Board composition as part of the Board's annual self-assessment process.

        The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies potential candidates by asking current directors and executive officers to notify the committee if they become aware of persons, meeting the criteria described above, who have had a change in circumstances that might make them available to serve on the Board—for example, retirement as a CEO or CFO of a public company or exiting


Table of Contents

government or military service. The Nominating and Governance Committee also, from time to time, may engage firms that specialize in identifying director candidates. As described above, the committee will also consider candidates recommended by stockholders.


Table of Contents

        The Nominating and Governance Committee may review publicly available information, conduct an interview and/or check references to assess the person's accomplishments and qualifications in light of the needs of the Board and the accomplishments and qualifications of any other candidates that the committee might be considering. The committee's evaluation process does not vary based on whether or not a candidate is recommended by a stockholder, although, as stated above, the Board may take into consideration the number of shares held by the recommending stockholder and the length of time that such shares have been held.

        Robert E. Knowling, Jr., Louis P. Miramontes and Arun Nayar were recommended for consideration byRussell Reynolds Associates, an executive search consulting firm, assisted the Nominating and Governance Committee by RSR Partners, an executive search consulting firm that assisted the Board in sourcing director candidates as part of the continuation of the Board's accelerated refreshment process. With respect to the two additions to the Board in April 2019, Busy Burr and Katherine Quinn were both vetted and recommended by Russell Reynolds Associates to the Nominating and Governance Committee for the Committee's consideration for appointment as independent directors.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

        In order to promote discussion among the non-management directors, regularly scheduled executive sessions (i.e., meetings of non-management directors without management present) are held to review such topics as the non-management directors determine. Mr. Regan, our Lead Independent Director, presides at our executive sessions. Effective as of the Annual Meeting, Mr. Bodaken, our Chairman of the Board, will presidepresides at our executive sessions. The non-management directors met in executive session 1014 times during fiscal year 2018.2019.

Communications with the Board of Directors

        The Board has established a process to receive communications from stockholders and other interested parties. Stockholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of the Board, any Board committee, or any chair of any such committee by mail or electronically. To communicate with the Board of Directors, the non-management directors, a committee of directors, or any individual directors, including our Lead Independent Director/Independent Chairman of the Board, correspondence should be addressed to the Board of Directors or any such individual directors, or committee of directors by either name or title. All such correspondence should be sent to Rite Aid Corporation, c/o Secretary, P.O. Box 3165, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105. To communicate with any of the directors electronically, stockholders should go to our website atwww.riteaid.com. Under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Board of Directors—Contact the Board of Directors" you will find an on-line form, as well as an email address, that may be used for writing an electronic message to the Board, the non-management directors, any individual directors, or any committee of directors. Please follow the instructions on the website in order to send your message.

        All communications received as set forth above will be opened by the Secretary for the purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to the directors, and depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication, will be distributed to the Board, the non-management directors, an individual director, or a committee of directors, as appropriate. The Secretary will make sufficient copies of the contents to send to each director who is a member of the Board or of the committee to which the envelope or e-mailemail is addressed.


Table of Contents

Directors' Attendance at Board, Committee, and Annual Meetings

        The Board of Directors held 2526 meetings during fiscal year 2018.2019. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings held by all committees on which such director served, during the period for which such director served.


Table of Contents

        It is our policy that directors are invited and encouraged to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Eight of our nine directors serving on the Board or nominated to serve on the Board at the time of the meeting attended the 20172018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Sustainability

        At the 2018 Annual Meeting, stockholders approved a proposal requesting that Rite Aid prepare a sustainability report describing the Company's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks and opportunities. A report describing the Company's ESG risks and opportunities will be released prior to the Annual Meeting. When available, the report will be posted on our website atwww.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Investor Relations."

        At Rite Aid, we conductare dedicated to integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance initiatives into our businessoperations, not only to retain value for our shareholders, our customers, and our associates, but also because "integrity in compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety regulations and in accordance withall we do" is one of our core values.

        We view conserving energy, avoidinghave a corporate social responsibility committee comprised of senior level leadership stakeholders with cross functional representation within the unnecessary generation of waste,Company. The corporate social responsibility committee produces our annual CSR report and carrying out company activities in ways that preserve and promote a clean, safe and healthy environment as the environmental and social sustainability priorities for our business. The Board receives periodic updates from the Company's managementleads progress on sustainability initiatives and progress.programs throughout the company. Our corporate social responsibility committee provides corporate social responsibility updates to our Board.

        Our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct outlines our core values and describes additional corporate policies on ESG issues, including polices in the areas of, among others, customer and worker safety and environmental management, including energy and waste minimization. We expect our officers, directors, and associates to uphold the standards set forth in the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct at work every day.

        We conduct our business in compliance with applicable environmental, health, and safety regulations. We view conserving energy, avoiding the unnecessary generation of waste, and carrying out company activities in ways that preserve and promote a clean, safe, and healthy environment as the environmental and social sustainability priorities for our business.

        We view adopting green business principles as part of our overall business strategy and believe it is a conscientious decision for our business, our community, and the environment. In recentOver the past five years, we have made significant investments in energy efficiency and waste reduction initiatives and have committed to building new and remodeled stores to meet or exceed the national building code standards for energy efficiency. For example, in striving to conserve energy and avoid the unnecessary generation of waste, we have upgradedinstalled LED lighting to reduce our annual electricityelectric consumption by 6318 million KWh, replaced less efficient rooftopcompleted a redesign of our Thrifty Ice Cream Plant in El Monte, California, which included upgrades to a safer refrigeration system and to lighting and HVAC units with higher-efficiency modelssystems to save 14reduce our annual electric consumption by eight million KWh per yearkWh, and installed over 1.3 million square feeta 1098 kW solar system at our distribution center in Lancaster, California that produces 30% of white "cool roof"the location's power needs. Over the past three years, we have seen a steady decrease in energy consumption in our retail stores and have reduced our total energy consumption in our retail stores during that period by 19,031,630 kWh on our facilities to significantly reduce solar heat gain and demand for air conditioning.a comparable store basis. In addition, Rite Aid utilizes best-in-class architectural and engineering design firms that employ Building Council LEED™-accredited staff in order to help us develop our new store designs that meet or exceed the national building code standards for energy efficiency.

        Recently, we announced that weWe have established a Chemical Policy and, in 2018, we expanded our Restricted Substances List as part of our ongoing efforts to meet customer expectations for chemical management and product safety. We have been working closely with our supplier partners to eliminate eight chemicals of high concern from formulated private brand items since 2016, and we expect to eliminate these chemicals from our private brand items by 2020. We have also expanded our Restricted Substances List to bring


Table of Contents

the total number of restricted chemicals from eight to 70.69. To assist stakeholders in understanding the impact of these initiatives, in 2019 we will begin reporting progress towards 100% elimination of the eight chemicals of high concern from our private brand products and the number of new products launched in a year that are free of the eight chemicals of high concern. Our long-term goal is to extend the Chemical Policy to cover all of the products sold in our stores. In 2019, we plan to extend the chemical program to cover formulated products like over-the-counter medications, vitamins and supplements, as well as food and beverages.

        We have also implemented "Responsible Sourcing Guidelines" (and objectives) to promote supply chains that support responsible forest management, the appropriate use of recycled content and responsible sourcing, including transparency, protocols, and mechanisms to track the wood fiber in the supply chain from its origin to the forest products supplied to Rite Aid and its customers. Our initial goal is to address the largest volume of forest products used in Rite Aid's daily business operations, such as advertising circular papers, copy and print paper and the pharmacy bags and labels used by our pharmacy and distribution centers. We have already made significant progress in achieving our goal, with 100% of the paper purchased for our advertising circulars being sourced from responsibly managed, forest-based suppliers that are compliant with independent forest certification standards.

Further information about our commitment to sustainability is available on our website under the headings "Corporate Info—Sustainability"Environmental Responsibility" and "Corporate Info—Chemical Policy."

Opioid Matter Oversight

        The Board, the Company's management, and the Company's employees recognize the opioid epidemic that is afflicting Americans across the United States as a serious public health issue, and we have publicly expressed our commitment to addressing opioid abuse in the communities we serve. At the 2018 Annual Meeting, stockholders approved a proposal requesting that Rite Aid prepare a report describing the corporate governance changes the Company has implemented since 2012 to more effectively monitor and manage financial and reputational risks related to the opioid crisis. The Company anticipates that a report describing the Company's approach to oversight of opioid matters will be released by October 1, 2019.

        The Board and management review the Company's plans and processes for managing risk at least annually. The Board oversees risk management and considers specific risk topics on an ongoing basis, including the risks associated with opioid medications. The Board also receives periodic updates from internal subject matter experts with regard to the overall effectiveness of the Company's risk management program and significant areas of risk to the Company, focusing on the five primary areas of risk set forth above as well as other areas of risk identified from time to time by the Board, a Board committee, or management, and including risks related to opioid dispensing and the status of ongoing initiatives to combat addiction risk in the communities Rite Aid serves. In addition, each Board committee regularly reports to the full Board on risks within their respective areas of responsibility. For example, the Compensation Committee annually reviews the Company's compensation plans, programs, and policies as they relate to the Company's risk management. Rite Aid management will continue to keep the Board updated on a regular basis concerning opioid dispensing-related activities and initiatives to combat addiction.

        At Rite Aid, we take our role as a community healthcare provider very seriously. This means going beyond simply complying with state laws and regulations to also raise awareness about important issues like prescription drug safety and drug abuse prevention. We are also committed to raising awareness about important issues like drug abuse prevention and prescription drug safety while advocating for increased access to education, treatment, and proper medication disposal. As one of health care's most accessible practitioners, pharmacists are uniquely positioned to help educate their patients and communities about promoting prescription safety. We are committed to working with our customers,


Table of Contents

local law enforcement, community groups, and both federal and state agencies to help reduce the opioid epidemic that is impacting our communities throughout the United States. Rite Aid's comprehensive strategy to address opioid and other drug abuse and misuse includes:


Table of Contents

        Further information about medication safety and disposal is available on our website under the headings "Pharmacy & Immunizations—Drug Safety & Disposal."

Directors' Compensation

        Each non-management director receives an annual payment of $100,000 in cash, payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, (i) the Lead Independent Director/Director received an additional annual payment of $25,000 (for so long as the Board had a Lead Independent Director); (ii) the Independent Chairman of the Board receives an additional annual payment of $25,000; (ii)$100,000; (iii) the Chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual payment of $20,000; (iii)(iv) the Chairs of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee each receive an additional annual payment of $10,000; and (iv)(v) each member of the Audit Committee (other than the Chair) receives an additional annual payment of $10,000. Non-management directors also receivedreceive an annual award of restricted stock or restricted stock units valued at $120,000 (with the number of shares subject to the grant calculated by dividing 120,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the day before the date of grant, rounded to the nearest whole share). ThePrior to 2019, the annual grant vestsprovided for vesting with respect to 80% on the first anniversary of the grant and 10% on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant. The Compensation Committee undertook a review of non-management director compensation in December 2018. The Compensation Committee engaged with independent compensation consultant Exequity LLP to provide a recommendation of our overall director compensation as compared to our new peer group as discussed in the section entitled "The Compensation Committee's Process—Assessment of Company performance." As a result of the recommendation to, and approval by, the Board of Directors, for fiscal year 2019 the amount of each of the annual cash retainer and annual stock-based award described above remain unchanged. The annual stock-based award for fiscal year 2019 vests on the date of grant and the shares subject to the grant become payable on a deferred basis upon the separation from service of the director. Directors who are officers and/or Rite Aid associates receive no separate compensation for service as directors or committee members. Directors are reimbursed for travel and lodging expenses associated with attending Board of Directors and Board committee meetings.

        Non-management directors are subject to our Stock Ownership Guidelines discussed on pages 5251 to 53.52.


Table of Contents


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 20182019

        The following Director Compensation Table sets forth fees, awards, and other compensation paid to or earned by our non-management directors who served during the fiscal year ended March 3, 2018:2, 2019:

Name
 Fees
Paid in
Cash ($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 Change In
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation ($)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total ($)  Fees
Paid in
Cash ($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 Change In
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
($)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total ($) 

Joseph B. Anderson, Jr.

 110,000 120,083     230,083  108,288 120,000     228,288 

Bruce G. Bodaken

 100,000 120,083     220,083  117,120 120,000     237,120 

David R. Jessick

 120,000 120,083     240,083 

Robert E. Knowling

 18,832 120,000     138,832 

Kevin E. Lofton

 110,000 120,083     230,083  110,000 120,000     230,000 

Myrtle Potter

 100,000 120,083     220,083 

Louis P. Miramontes

 25,524 120,000     145,524 

Arun Nayar

 18,832 120,000     138,832 

Michael N. Regan

 135,000 120,083     255,083  130,973 120,000     250,973 

Frank A. Savage

 109,102 120,083     229,185 

Marcy Syms

 110,000 120,083     230,083  112,163 120,000     232,163 

David R. Jessick(3)

 99,457      99,457 

Myrtle Potter(3)

 82,880      82,880 

Frank A. Savage(3)

 82,880      82,880 

(1)
Represents the grant date fair value of stock awards granted in February 2019 in respect of fiscal year 20182019 in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Topic 718. For information regarding the assumptions used in determining the fair value of an award, please refer to Note 17 to our financial statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 26, 2018. We recognize expense ratably over25, 2019. Delivery of the three-year vesting period.shares underlying the stock awards is deferred until the directors' separation from services.

(2)
The number of unvested restricted stock awards outstanding as of March 3, 20182, 2019 for each director is detailed in the table below.
Name
 Grant Date Number of
Stock
Awards (#)
 

Joseph B. Anderson, Jr. 

  June 25, 20151,382

June 22, 2016  3,10077 

  July 17, 2017  51,984519 

Bruce G. Bodaken

  June 25, 20151,382

June 22, 2016  3,10077 

  July 17, 2017  51,984519 

David R. JessickKevin E. Lofton

June 25, 20151,382

  June 22, 2016  3,10077 

  July 17, 2017  51,984519 

Kevin E. LoftonMichael N. Regan

June 25, 20151,382

  June 22, 2016  3,10077 

  July 17, 2017  51,984519 

Myrtle PotterMarcy Syms

June 25, 20151,382

  June 22, 2016  3,10077 

  July 17, 2017  51,984519 

Michael N. Regan David R. Jessick(3)

  June 25, 2015  1,382 

Myrtle Potter(3)

  June 22, 2016  3,100

July 17, 201751,984 

Frank A. SavageSavage(3)

  June 25, 2015  1,382

June 22, 20163,100

July 17, 201751,984

Marcy Syms

June 25, 20151,382

June 22, 20163,100

July 17, 201751,984 
(3)
Each of Ms. Potter and Messrs. Jessick and Savage served as a member of the Board through the date of our 2018 Annual Meeting. Any outstanding, unvested shares were cancelled upon their separation from the Board.

Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 2

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

        The accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte & Touche") has been selected as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending March 2, 2019.February 29, 2020. Deloitte & Touche has audited the accounts and records of Rite Aid and its subsidiaries since 2000. Although the selection of accounting firms does not require ratification, the Board of Directors has directed that the appointment of Deloitte & Touche be submitted to the stockholders for ratification due to the significance of their appointment by the Company. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche, the Audit Committee will consider the appointment of another independent registered public accounting firm. A representative of Deloitte & Touche will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.


RECOMMENDATION


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR"
THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY'S
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019.2020.


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are including in this proxy statement a resolution, subject to stockholder vote, to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (as defined in the section entitled "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis").

        Prior to voting, stockholders may wish toshould carefully review our discussion of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as presented in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, tables, and narrative disclosure on pages 3633 to 53,66, as well as the discussion of modifications made as a result of stockholder outreach efforts on pages 36 to 37, and the discussion regarding the Compensation Committee on pages 1817 to 19.18.

        The Company's primary compensation goals for our Named Executive Officers are to attract, motivate, and retain the most talented and dedicated executives and to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with the interests of our stockholders. The Company's compensation programs are designed to reward our Named Executive Officers for the achievement of annual and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased total stockholder return, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. The Company encourages stockholders to review the executive compensation disclosure in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and executive compensation tables in this proxy statement for complete details of how its compensation policies and proceduresprogram for its Named Executive Officers, operatechanges made since the prior fiscal year, and arehow the program is designed to achieve the Company's compensation objectives.

        We believe that the Company's compensation programs for its Named Executive Officers have been effective at promoting the achievement of positive results,operated to appropriately aligningalign pay andwith performance and in enablingenabled the Company to attract and retain very talented executives within our industry, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking.

        We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a "say-on-pay" proposal, gives you as a stockholder the opportunity to express your views on our fiscal year 20182019 compensation for our Named Executive Officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

        Accordingly, the following resolution is submitted for a stockholder vote at the Annual Meeting:

        "RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative discussion."

        Although this is an advisory vote which will not be binding on the Compensation Committee or the Board, the Compensation Committee and the Board will carefully review the results of the stockholder vote. The Compensation Committee will consider stockholders' concerns and take them into account in future determinations concerning compensation of its Named Executive Officers. The Board therefore recommends that you indicate your support for the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Offices in fiscal year 2018,2019, as outlined in the above resolution.


RECOMMENDATION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR"
THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF ITS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,
AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.


Table of Contents


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALSPROPOSAL

        We expect the following proposalsproposal (Proposal No. 4 Proposal No. 5 and Proposal No. 6 on the proxy card) to be presented by stockholders at the Annual Meeting. The proposalsproposal and supporting statementsstatement may contain assertions about Rite Aid or other statements that we believe are incorrect. We have not attempted to refute all of thethese inaccuracies, in the proposals and supporting statements, and the Company is not responsible for the content of the proposals.proposal. The Board has recommended a vote against these proposalsthe proposal for the reasons set forth following eachthe proposal.


PROPOSAL NO. 4

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL—INDEPENDENT CHAIRMANSEEKING A BY-LAW AMENDMENT FOR A 10% OWNERSHIP
THRESHOLD FOR STOCKHOLDERS TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS

        Steven Krol, who owns 246,775approximately 12,763 shares of common stock (based on information provided to us by Mr. Krol)Krol and adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split that occurred in April 2019) and whose address will be provided by the Company promptly upon oral or written request, has notified us that he intends to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors strongly opposes adoption of the proposal and asks stockholders to review the Board's response, which follows the proposal and the proponent's supporting statement below.

Stockholder Proposal and Supporting Statement


Table of Contents


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
"AGAINST" THIS
PROPOSAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

        The Board believes this stockholder proposal is unnecessary to increase management accountability to all its shareholders and not in the best interests of stockholders. As described in detail on pages 7 to 8 of this proxy statement, as of the Annual Meeting, the Board has currently determined to separate the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board effective at the Annual Meeting.

        Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines the Board has the flexibility to determine whether it is in the best interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders to separate or combine the roles of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer at any point in time. This proposal would remove this flexibility and narrow the governance arrangements that the Board may consider, which could be contrary to the best interests of our stockholders. Given the dynamic and competitive environment in which we operate, and the strategic challenges we face, the right leadership structure may vary from time to time based on changes in circumstances. Accordingly, the Board believes it should be permitted to use its business judgment to determine the right leadership structure based on what it believes best serves the needs of the Company and its stockholders at any particular time.

        The Board believes that its current structure and governance practices allow it to provide effective, independent oversight of the Company and the Chief Executive Officer. Our governance practices are described in detail on pages 15 to 22 of this proxy statement.

        In view of our sound governance practices, the Board believes that the proposal is an unnecessary limitation on the Board's flexibility.


RECOMMENDATION

FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH ABOVE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "AGAINST" THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUIRING AN INDEPENDENT CHAIRMAN.


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 5

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL—SUSTAINABILITY REPORT

        The Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia, which owns 900 shares of common stock (based on information provided to us by the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia), and Trinity Health, which owns 100 shares of common stock (based on information provided to us by Trinity Health), each of whose address will be provided by the Company promptly upon oral or written request, have notified us that they intend to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors strongly opposes adoption of the proposal and asks stockholders to review the Board's response, which follows the proposal and the proponents' supporting statement below.

Stockholder Proposal and Supporting Statement

Sustainability Reporting
2018—Rite Aid Corporation


Table of Contents


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
"AGAINST" THIS
PROPOSAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

        The Board believes this stockholder proposal is unnecessary as our stockholders already have the right to call special meetings.

        As discussed on pages 7 to 8 of this proxy statement, the Company has had a more robust stockholder engagement program in recent months. After carefully considering feedback from our stockholders, in April 2019, the Board amended our By-Laws to permit special meetings of the stockholders to be called by stockholders of record holding at least 20% of the Company's common stock. The Board believes that a 20% ownership threshold for the right to call special meetings strikes a reasonable and appropriate balance between enhancing stockholder rights and protecting against the risk that a small group of stockholders, including stockholders with special interests, could call special meetings.

        Allowing a small group of stockholders to call special meetings could be detrimental to the interests of a majority of our stockholders and other stakeholders. The Company's current 20% ownership threshold provides a reasonable number of stockholders with a meaningful right to require the Company to hold a special meeting without exposing the Company and its stockholders to unreasonable expense and disruption. These costs can be significant, including the costs of preparing and distributing proxy materials and the diversion of Board and management attention from the oversight and management of our business. Because special meetings require a considerable investment in resources, they should be limited to circumstances where a meaningful number of stockholders believe a matter is sufficiently urgent or extraordinary that it must be addressed between annual meetings. We believe a 20% threshold strikes the necessary balance between enhancing our stockholders' ability to act on important matters in between annual meetings and protecting the Company and other stockholders by allowing only a meaningful group of stockholders to exercise this right.

        The Board believes that the Company's current special meeting stockholder right should be evaluated in the context of our demonstrated commitment to best practices and accountability and responsiveness to our stockholders. Our governance practices, including ways to communicate with our Board, are described on pages 14 to 24 of this proxy statement. In particular, as described on page 20 of this proxy statement, stockholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of the Board, any Board committee or any chair of any such committee by mail or electronically.

        We actively engage with our stockholders throughout the year, and we share feedback from those discussions with our entire Board. At times, our directors participate in those discussions and speak to stockholders directly. Following engagement with our stockholders, the Board accelerated the Board refreshment process, nominating three new independent directors at the 2018 Annual Meeting and appointing two new independent directors in April 2019. In addition, the Board has a history of being responsive to stockholders, amending our By-Laws in April 2015 to adopt a proxy access right and in December 2018 to require that the Chairman of the Board be an independent director. Additionally, following the 2018 annual meeting, the Company is working to produce reports on the Company's consideration of sustainability matters and the Company's approach to oversight of opioid matters, which are discussed on pages 21 to 24 of this proxy statement.


Table of Contents

        In view of the existing right of stockholders to call special meetings and our other sound governance practices that ensure accountability of the Board and management to stockholders, the Board believes this stockholder proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of stockholders.

        Our Board believes that our existing corporate disclosures, including the environmental, social and governance ("ESG") information available on our website, adequately describe our approach to ESG matters. Production of a formal sustainability report would require significant time and expense and would have little added benefit to stockholders in light of the ESG-related disclosures that we already furnish. Accordingly, our Board does not believe that preparing a formal sustainability report of the type requested in the stockholder proposal is in the best interest of our stockholders at this time.

        At Rite Aid, we conduct our business in compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety regulations and in accordance with our core values. We are committed to conserving energy, avoiding the unnecessary generation of waste, and carrying out company activities in ways that preserve and promote a clean, safe and healthy environment. We publicly affirm these commitments in our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, which is available on our website atwww.riteaid.com under the headings "Corporate Info—Governance—Codes of Ethics."

        Our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct outlines our core values and describes additional corporate policies on ESG issues, including polices in the areas of customer and worker safety, privacy and security, environmental management, including energy and waste minimization, and supply-chain risks. We expect our officers, directors and associates to uphold the standards set forth in the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct at work every day.

        Further information about our commitment to environmental sustainability is available on our website under the headings "Corporate Info—Sustainability." As described on our website, we believe that adopting green business principles is a conscientious decision for our business, our community and the environment. In recent years, we have made significant investments in energy efficiency and waste reduction initiatives and have committed to building new and remodeled stores to meet or exceed the national building code standards for energy efficiency.

        Rite Aid remains committed to providing reasonable ESG information to our stakeholders, including investors, customers and our communities. Accordingly, we will continue to assess how to expand and improve disclosures related to our ESG initiatives. Nevertheless, our Board believes that preparation of the broad and general report requested by the stockholder proposal is not in the best interest of our stockholders at this time and would not be an efficient use of our financial and human resources. Such a report would be an expensive and time-consuming exercise that would be largely duplicative of information already available on our website or otherwise publicly available.


RECOMMENDATION

FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH ABOVE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY
RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "AGAINST" THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDINGSEEKING A SUSTAINABILITY REPORT.
BY-LAW AMENDMENT FOR A 10% OWNERSHIP THRESHOLD FOR STOCKHOLDERS TO CALL
SPECIAL MEETINGS.


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL NO. 6

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL—REPORT ON GOVERNANCE MEASURES
RELATED TO OPIOIDS

        The UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, which owns 258,666 shares of common stock (based on information provided to us by the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust) and whose address will be provided by the Company promptly upon oral or written request, has notified us that it intends to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors strongly opposes adoption of the proposal and asks stockholders to review the Board's response, which follows the proposal and the proponent's supporting statement below.

Stockholder Proposal and Supporting Statement


SUPPORTING STATEMENT


Table of Contents


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
"AGAINST" THIS
PROPOSAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

        The Board believes that the stockholder proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of stockholders.

        The Board, the Company's management and the Company's employees recognize the opioid epidemic that is afflicting Americans across the United States as a serious public health issue, and we have publicly expressed our commitment to addressing opioid abuse in the communities we serve. However, our Board believes that its committee charters and our existing disclosures, including the governance and other information available on our website and on pages 15 to 22 of this proxy statement, adequately describe our approach to corporate governance matters, including risk management. The Company already publicly discloses information regarding how the Board oversees the Company's management of risk, focusing primarily on five areas of risk: operational, financial performance, financial reporting, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational. We also publicly disclose the Company's Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct provides guidelines to our associates on how to reduce risk through ethical conduct and compliance with laws.

        As discussed in this proxy statement, the Board reviews with management its plans and processes for managing risk at least annually. The Board oversees risk management and considers specific risk topics on an ongoing basis, including the risks associated with opioid medications. The Board also receives periodic updates from the Company's compliance and internal assurance services with regard to the overall effectiveness of the Company's risk management program and significant areas of risk to the Company, focusing on the five primary areas of risk set forth above as well as other areas of risk identified from time to time by the Board, a Board committee or management, and including risks related to the Company's distribution of opioid medications. In addition, each Board committee regularly reports to the full Board on risks within their respective areas of responsibility. For example, the Compensation Committee annually reviews the Company's compensation plans, programs and policies as they relate to the Company's risk management.

        We believe that communication between the Board and our stockholders is a critical aspect of our corporate governance program. As discussed on pages 7 to 9 of this proxy statement, the Company has enhanced its stockholder engagement effort and expects to continue this effort in the coming year.

        At Rite Aid, we are committed to working with our customers, local law enforcement, community groups and both federal and state agencies to help reduce the opioid epidemic that is impacting our


Table of Contents

communities throughout the United States. Rite Aid's comprehensive strategy to address opioid and other drug abuse and misuse includes:


Table of Contents

        Rite Aid remains committed to providing reasonable governance information to our stakeholders, including investors, customers and our communities. Accordingly, we will continue to assess how to expand and improve disclosures related to our governance initiatives related to the opioid epidemic. Nevertheless, our Board believes that preparation of the report requested by the stockholder proposal is not in the best interest of our stockholders at this time and would not be an efficient use of our financial and human resources. Such a report would be largely duplicative of information already available on our website or otherwise publicly available.


RECOMMENDATION

FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH ABOVE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "AGAINST" THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING A REPORT ON GOVERNANCE MEASURES RELATED TO OPIOIDS.


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        Officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Set forth below is information, as of September 10, 2018,May 31, 2019, regarding the current executive officers of Rite Aid.

Name
 Age Position with Rite Aid

John T. Standley(1)

  5556 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Kermit Crawford

59President and Chief Operating Officer

Darren W. Karst

58Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer

Bryan B. Everett

  4546 Chief Operating Officer of Rite Aid Stores

Matthew Schroeder

49Chief Financial Officer

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

  4849 Executive Vice President, Pharmacy and Retail Operations

David AbelmanBrian Hoover

  5954 Executive Vice President, MarketingChief Accounting Officer

Derek Scott GriffithBen Bulkley

  56 Chief Executive Vice President, Store Operations

Matthew Schroeder

48Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurerof EnvisionRxOptions

(1)
Mr. Standley's biographical information is provided above inOn March 12, 2019, the section identifyingCompany announced that the Board of Directors.was commencing a search process for a new Chief Executive Officer.

        Kermit Crawford.John T. Standley.    Mr. Crawford joined Rite Aid Corporation inStandley, Chief Executive Officer, has been Chief Executive Officer since June 2010 and was President from September 2008 until June 2013. Mr. Standley served as Chairman of the Board from June 21, 2012 through October 2017 as President and30, 2018. He was the Chief Operating Officer. Most recently, Mr. Crawford hasOfficer from September 2008 until June 2010. He also served as a retailconsultant to Rite Aid from July 2008 to September 2008. From August 2005 through December 2007, Mr. Standley served as Chief Executive Officer and healthcare adviser and consultant for New York City-based Sycamore Partners,was a private equity firm specializing in retail and consumer investments, since 2015. Prior to joining Sycamore Partners, Mr. Crawford, a licensed pharmacist, spent more than 30 years with Walgreens, where he held a wide rangemember of store operations and senior management positions, including responsibility for the company's pharmacy services, which included its pharmacy benefit management services. When he retired from Walgreens in 2014, Mr. Crawford was executive vice president and president of Walgreens' pharmacy, health and wellness division, where he was responsible for all aspects of strategic, operational, and financial management for the division. Mr. Crawford also serves on the board of directors for The Allstate Corporation and LifePoint Health,of Pathmark Stores, Inc.

        Darren W. Karst.    Mr. Karst was appointed From June 2002 to August 2005, he served as Senior Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer effective October 25, 2015. Priorof Rite Aid and, in addition, in January 2004 was appointed Chief Financial Officer of Rite Aid. He had served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rite Aid from September 2000 to this appointment, Mr. KarstJune 2002 and had served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2014. Prior to joiningof Rite Aid from 2002December 1999 until 2014,September 2000. Mr. KarstStandley served ason the SUPERVALU INC. board of directors from May 2013 to July 2015 and on the board of directors of CarMax, Inc. from August 2017 to January 2018. Mr. Standley currently serves on the National Association of Chain Drug Stores' board of directors and is a member of the Board's Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary with Roundy's, Inc., a Wisconsin-based supermarket chain. From March 1995 until March 1996, Mr. Karst served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director of Dominick's Supermarkets, Inc. and from March 1996 until the acquisition of Dominick's by Safeway in 1998, Mr. Karst served as Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director. Mr. Karst was a partner at the Yucaipa Companies, a private equity investment firm, from 1991 to 2002.Committee.

        Bryan B. Everett.    Mr. Everett was appointed Chief Operating Officer as of March 12, 2019. Prior to his promotion to this position, Mr. Everett served as Chief Operating Officer of Rite Aid Stores as ofsince September 1, 2017. Prior to his promotion to thisthat position, Mr. Everett served as the Executive Vice President of Store Operations since joining the Company on August 3, 2015. Previously, Mr. Everett served as the Senior Vice President of Store Operations at Target Corporation, overseeing the support functions and strategy for all stores. From February 2011 to March 2014, Mr. Everett served as the Senior Vice President of Target stores in the north region, with responsibility for total operations of 457 stores. Mr. Everett held multiple senior leadership positions in stores, operations, and merchandising at Target since 2002. Prior to joining Target, Mr. Everett held leadership positions in the grocery industry with Aldi Foods and Fleming Wholesale.


Table of Contents

        Jocelyn Z. Konrad.    Ms. Konrad was appointed Executive Vice President, Pharmacy and Retail Operations effective March 12, 2019, after serving in the role as Executive Vice President, Pharmacy since August 3, 2015. Prior positions at Rite Aid include Regional Pharmacy Vice President, President of Healthcare Initiatives and most recently, Group Vice President of Pharmacy Initiatives and Clinical Services. Prior to joining Rite Aid, Ms. Konrad served as a District Manager for Eckerd Pharmacy from 1997 through 2007. From 1992 to 1997, she served as a pharmacist for Thrift Drug Pharmacy. Ms. Konrad is a registered pharmacist and holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Philadelphia College of Pharmacy and Science.


        David Abelman.    Mr. Abelman was appointed Executive Vice PresidentTable of Marketing effective August 3, 2015. Prior to this position, he served as our Senior Vice President of Brand Development & Innovation since April 2014. Prior to joining Rite Aid, Mr. Abelman was CEO and co-founder of Self Health Nation. Mr. Abelman also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing & Merchandising Officer at AC Moore from May 2009 through December 2011 and Senior Vice President of Marketing for Michael's from August 2005 through December 2007. He has also held senior marketing positions at Office Depot, Daymon Associates and the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company.

        Derek Scott Griffith.    Mr. Griffith is the Company's Executive Vice President of Store Operations. In this position, Mr. Griffith is responsible for all aspects of the company's chainwide store operations. Mr. Griffith is a skilled leader with more than 30 years of experience in store operations. He joined Rite Aid in 2008 as a regional vice president of store operations. In 2010, he was promoted to senior vice president of store operations, with responsibility for more than 1,100 Rite Aid stores in the Northeast and Midwest. Prior to joining Rite Aid, Mr. Griffith held various store operations roles with increasing responsibility at Target and Home Depot. Mr. Griffith holds a bachelor's degree in petroleum engineering from West Virginia University.Contents

        Matthew Schroeder.    Mr. Schroeder was appointed Chief Financial Officer as of March 12, 2019. Prior to his promotion to this position, Mr. Schroeder served as Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer of Rite Aid Corporation effective November 2,since 2017. Mr. Schroeder joined Rite Aid in 2000 as vice presidentVice President of financial accountingFinancial Accounting and was promotedserved as Group Vice President of Strategy, Investor Relations and Treasurer from 2010 to group vice president of strategy, investor relations and treasurer in 2010.2017. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Schroeder worked for Arthur Andersen, LLP, where he held several positions of increasing responsibility, including audit senior and audit manager. Mr. Schroeder earned his bachelor's degree in accounting from Indiana University of Pennsylvania. He also currently serves as treasurer and a member of the board of directors of The Rite Aid Foundation.

        Brian Hoover.    Mr. Hoover was appointed Chief Accounting Officer as of March 12, 2019. Prior to his promotion to this position, Mr. Hoover served as Group Vice President and Controller of the Company since 2017. Prior to that position, Mr. Hoover served as Vice President, Financial Reporting and Accounting from 2008 to 2017. Over the past 24 years, Mr. Hoover has served in various positions of increasing responsibility at the Company in financial analysis, category management and marketing, budgeting, and accounting.

        Ben Bulkley.    Mr. Bulkley was appointed Chief Executive Officer of EnvisionRxOptions as of February 21, 2019. Prior to joining the Company, he most recently served as chief executive officer and co-founder of Trellis Rx, a private equity-backed company that builds specialty pharmacies for health systems. Prior to Trellis Rx, Mr. Bulkley led the specialty businesses of Aetna Inc., including its pharmacy, behavioral health, and TPA businesses. Mr. Bulkley has also served as chief operating officer of Allscripts Health Solutions, Inc., a healthcare IT platform provider focused on connected care; senior vice president of global commercial operations at Invitrogen, a provider of life sciences technologies for disease research and drug discovery; and vice president and general manager of global services in the IT division of General Electric Company's Healthcare business.


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

        We encourage you to read this Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a detailed discussion and analysis of our fiscal year 20182019 executive compensation program for the individuals named below. We refer to these individuals throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the accompanying tables as our "Named Executive Officers." Except for the disclosure under the heading "Termination of Merger Agreement with Albertsons Companies, Inc." and updated disclosure under


Table of Contents

the heading "Retention Efforts in Fiscal Year 2018," this Compensation Discussion and Analysis was previously included in our Form 10-K/A as filed with the SEC on June 1, 2018.

Name
 Title

John T. Standley

 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Kermit CrawfordCrawford(1)

 President and Chief Operating Officer

Darren W. KarstKarst(2)

 Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer

Bryan B. EverettEverett(3)

 Chief Operating Officer, Rite Aid Stores

Jocelyn Z. KonradKonrad(4)

 Executive Vice President, Pharmacy

Enio A. Montini, Jr.*

Former Executive Vice President, Merchandising & Distribution

*(1)
Mr. Montini retired effectiveCrawford left the Company as of December 15, 2017.March 12, 2019.

(2)
Mr. Karst left the Company as of May 31, 2019.

(3)
Mr. Everett was promoted to Chief Operating Officer of the Company effective March 12, 2019.

(4)
Ms. Konrad was promoted to Executive Vice President, Pharmacy and Retail Operations effective March 12, 2019.

Executive Summary

        Rite Aid Corporation is the third largest retail drugstore chain in the United States based on revenues and number of stores operating 2,550 stores as of March 3, 2018 in 19 states. We also operate ourand has Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM) company,("PBM") operations through EnvisionRxOptions and its affiliates. As of March 2, 2019, we operated 2,469 retail drugstores in 18 states across the country.

        We, along with the retail pharmacy industry as wea whole, continue to face challenges in relying significantly on third party payors. Over the past several years, third party payors, including the Medicare Part D plans and the state-sponsored Medicaid and related managed care Medicaid agencies, have changed the eligibility requirements of participants and have successfully reduced reimbursement rates, causing a reduction in our transition into a retail healthcare organization.Adjusted EBITDA.

        Fiscal year 2019 was impacted by two significant events:

        Additionally, after fiscal year end, we implemented a leadership transition plan that will significantly change our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2020.


Table of Contents

        On February 18, 2018, Rite Aid entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Albertsons Ranch Acquisition II LLC, a Delaware limited liability companyCompanies, Inc. and a wholly-owned direct subsidiarythe Merger Subs. Based on the lack of Albertsons ("Merger Sub II") and Ranch Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of Merger Sub II ("Merger Sub" and, together with Merger Sub II, the "Merger Subs"). Onour stockholder support, on August 8, 2018, Rite Aid, Albertsons, and the Merger Subs entered into a Merger Termination Agreement (the "Termination Agreement") pursuant to which the parties mutually agreed to terminate the Merger Agreement. Subject to limited customary exceptions, the Merger Termination Agreement also mutually releasesreleased the parties from any claims of liability to one another relating to the contemplated merger transaction. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, neither Rite Aid nor Albertsons were responsible for any payments to the other party as a result ofmerger. With the termination of the Merger Agreement.

        Termination of Merger Agreement with Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. ("WBA").    After pursuit of a merger, with WBA and Victoria Merger Sub, Inc. for nearly 20 months, on June 28, 2017 Rite Aid WBAis no longer subject to the interim operating covenants and Victoria Merger Sub, Inc. entered into a Termination Agreement (the "WBA Merger Termination Agreement") under whichrestrictions in the parties agreed to terminate the WBA Merger Agreement. The WBA Merger Termination Agreement provides that WBA would pay to Rite Aid a termination fee in the amount of $325.0 million, which we received June 30, 2017.

        On June 28,September 18, 2017, Rite Aidwe entered into an assetAmended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement ("APA") with WBA. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the APA, WBA agreed to purchase agreement with WBA, which was amended and restated on September 18, 2017, agreeing to sellfrom Rite Aid 1,932 stores, three distribution centers, related inventory, and other specificspecified assets and liabilities related thereto for a purchase price of approximately $4.375 billion. On October 17, 2017, we beganbillion, on a cash-free, debt-free basis.

        We completed the store transfer process in March of selling2018, which resulted in the assets to be sold to WBA in accordance with the terms and provisionstransfer of this agreement. During the fifty-two weeks ended March 3, 2018, we sold 1,651all 1,932 stores and related assets to WBA in exchangeand have received cash proceeds of $4.157 billion. On September 13, 2018, we completed the sale of one of our distribution centers and related assets to WBA for proceeds of $3,553.5$61.2 million. The transfer of the two remaining distribution centers and related assets remains subject to minimal customary closing conditions applicable only to the distribution centers being transferred at such distribution center closings, as specified in the APA.

        We have agreed to provide transition services under the Transitional Services Agreement ("TSA") to WBA for up to three years after the initial closing of the sale. Under the terms of the TSA, we provide various services on behalf of WBA, including but not limited to the purchase and distribution of inventory and virtually all selling, general, and administrative activities. The initial term of the TSA was to continue until October 17, 2019. On May 1, 2019, WBA provided Rite Aid with written notice that it was extending the TSA for two additional six-month periods, which extends the end date of the TSA to October 17, 2020. Pursuant to the TSA, WBA paid TSA fees of $80.2 million during the fifty-two week period ended March 2, 2019 and $8.4 million in the fifty-two week period ended March 3, 2018, which were usedare reflected as a reduction to repay outstanding debt,selling, general, and recognized a pre-tax gainadministrative expenses.

        As previously announced, since the close of $2.1 billion. We estimate that the total pre-tax gain on the sale will be approximately $2.5 billion. As of March 27, 2018,2019 fiscal year, we have completedexecuted on a leadership transition plan and an organizational restructuring to better align our Company's structure with the store transferCompany's size and operations and to reduce costs. As part of the leadership transition, the Board has commenced a search process for a new CEO. John Standley will remain CEO until the appointment of his successor. Bryan Everett, Chief Operating Officer of Rite Aid Stores, has been promoted to Chief Operating Officer of the Company, succeeding Kermit Crawford, who has left the Company. Matt Schroeder, formerly our Chief Accounting Officer and all 1,932 storesTreasurer, has been promoted to Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Schroeder succeeded Darren Karst, who left the Company this spring after supporting a brief transition. Jocelyn Konrad, Executive Vice President, Pharmacy, has been promoted to Executive Vice President, Pharmacy and related assetsRetail Operations. In addition, the Company announced actions that will reduce managerial layers and consolidate roles across the organization, resulting in the elimination of approximately 400 full-time positions, or more than 20% of the corporate positions located at the Company's headquarters and across the field organization.


Table of Contents

have been transferred to WBA. The transfer of the three distribution centers and related inventory is expected to begin after September 1, 2018.

        In fiscal year 2018, we continued reporting our business in two distinct segments. Our Retail Pharmacy Segment consists of Rite Aid stores, RediClinic and Health Dialog. Our Pharmacy Services Segment consists of EnvisionRx, our PBM that has been rebranded as EnvisionRxOptions. The above changes and challenges for our business resulted in the need to address retention concerns in the immediate term.

        We feel that we have assembled a very strong team of executives, which has in turn resulted in our ability to attract and retain highly talented individuals at all levels of the organization who are committed to our core values of excellence, integrity and respect for people and have the ability to execute our strategic and operational priorities. This combination of strong executive leadership and a highly talented and motivated supporting team has enabled us to focus in on a robust suite of assets that are both strong and unique in the retail healthcare space.

        Despite our executive leadership team's continued focus on driving our business, we were faced with continued prescription reimbursement rate challenges that we were unable to fully offset, which is an issue that has also impacted the broader retail pharmacy industry and which has negatively impacted our Adjusted EBITDA. Additionally, the extended duration of the WBA merger and asset sale process, the establishment of TSA services, the attempted merger with Albertsons, and the resulting uncertainty had a negative impact on our fiscal year 20182019 results. We were also excluded from some PBM networks and faced continued pharmacy reimbursement rate challenges that we were unable to offset with reductions in drug purchasing costs. Below is additional detail related to key financial indicators used as performance measures in our incentive programs for fiscal year 2018.2019. All amounts, unless stated otherwise, are for continuing operations:

        We believe strongly that pay should align with performance, and this focus is reflected in our executive compensation programs. We seek to provide our Named Executive Officers with opportunities to earn total direct compensation (base salary, annual incentives, and long-term incentives) that areis generally aligned withcomparable to compensation levels provided to peer company executives and executives within similarly-sizedother similarly sized retailers more broadly.


Table With the compensation programs' strong focus on performance and the continued operating pressures related to the WBA and Albertsons transactions, prior to fiscal year 2019, we provided some of Contentsour executive officers with retention awards in an effort to retain them during the time of uncertainty. See the Wind-Down of Retention section on pages 49 to 50 for further discussion of these efforts.

        Because of our desire to reinforce a performance-based culture, the Company emphasizes a payregular compensation mix that is comprised primarily of variable pay. As a result, base salary makes up the smallest portion of total direct compensation for the Named Executive Officers, with variable pay in the form of annual and long-term incentives comprising the large, remaining portion. The compensation mix varies by position, taking into account each position's ability to influence Company results, as well as competitive practice. See page 4342 for a graphical representation of pay mix by executive.


Table of Contents

        In July of 2017, our stockholders voted to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation every year. Consistent with that vote, the Board resolved to hold an advisory "say-on-pay" vote every year in connection with its annual meeting of stockholders.

        At our 20172018 Annual Meeting, held October 30, 2018 after the termination of the Albertsons transaction, approximately 87%16.5% of shares voting on the proposal voted in favor of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers on a non-binding, advisory basis. As a result ofOfficers. The Compensation Committee took the strong supportdisapproval of our executive compensation by our stockholders in respectvery seriously. The outcome of theour 2018 say-on-pay vote conducted atwas a clear signal that our 2017 Annual Meeting, the Compensation Committee determined that no material structural design changes should be made tostockholders took issue with some aspects of our executive compensation program, forand we were determined to understand stockholder perspectives on this program and committed to making constructive changes in response.

        After the termination of the Albertsons transaction, we engaged in enhanced stockholder outreach efforts. Investors' main concern with matters of compensation was the use of retention awards and the mid-year adjustment to the fiscal year 2018 annual incentive performance target. At that time, while the Compensation Committee was focused on a performance-based culture, it also recognized the importance of keeping management engaged during a time of significant challenges, including supporting the TSA processes, and entering into the Albertsons Merger Agreement. The decision to use retention awards was also made with the knowledge that much of the previously granted performance-based awards were tracking below target metrics and had a high likelihood of not having any realizable value, which heightened the risk that we would be unable to attract and retain the talent needed to run our business. For a comparison of the Named Executive OfficersOfficers' realized long-term performance pay to the compensation shown in fiscal year 2018.the Summary Compensation Table disclosure, see the discussion under the caption "Realized Long-Term Incentive Awards" on pages 42 to 43.

        We have continued to engage with stockholders since August 2018 and following the 2018 Annual Meeting, including on compensation matters. Based on the "say-on-pay" voting results and the feedback we received from stockholders, the Company took action to review all compensation programs in place and incorporate design changes into the compensation structures to ensure stronger stockholder alignment going forward.


Table of Contents

What We Heard from Stockholders

Actions We Took in Response

Our stockholders generally did not approve of the use of retention awards.

We did not enter into any new individual retention agreements with any of our Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2019 and have no plans to enter into any such new retention agreements in fiscal year 2020.

Our stockholders generally did not approve of a mid-year adjustment to our fiscal year 2018 annual incentive plan to reflect the impact of the significant events and operational challenges occurring in the first half of fiscal year 2018.

We did not make any adjustments to our incentive plans for fiscal year 2019 and do not intend to make any mid-year adjustments to our incentive plans for fiscal year 2020.

Our stockholders expressed a general discomfort with a lack of alignment between Company performance and pay.

While we understand the concern based on reported pay, the realized value of our performance-based long-term pay was aligned with stockholder return. See the impact on Realized Long-Term Incentives on pages 42 to 43.

We refined our peer group for fiscal year 2020 to (among other changes) remove CVS Health Corp. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.; even though each organization is a direct competitor from both business and talent acquisition perspectives, the Compensation Committee determined that these organizations are no longer appropriate peers given their significantly larger scope of operations.

We increased the emphasis on performance-based long-term incentives in fiscal year 2019, such that Performance-Based Restricted Cash Units represented 70% of the total long-term incentive opportunity, and time-based restricted stock represented 30% of the total long-term incentive opportunity.

As in the past, the Compensation Committee will continue to review the results of future advisory say-on-pay votes and will consider stockholder concerns and take them into account in future determinations concerningregarding the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

        While focused on our compensation philosophy of pay based on performance in fiscal year 2018, with the impact on our business of the prolonged WBA merger attempt and asset sale and the resulting uncertainty, along with being excluded from some PBM networks and facing continued pharmacy reimbursement rate challenges, we believed it was also important to incorporate a retention program for our leadership team. In addition to providing for pay based on performance metrics intended to be aligned with stockholder returns we provided time based retention awards to our key leaders, including the Named Executive Officers.

        We used Adjusted EBITDA as the primary financial metric in our annual incentive plan and long-term performance awards in fiscal year 2018.2019. We believe this was appropriate because EBITDA growth has historically shown a strong positive correlation with three-year and five-year total stockholder return for Rite Aid and its peer group and represented the best indicator of Rite Aid's operating performance based on our financial situation and corporate structure. In establishing performance measures for our fiscal year 2019 incentive programs, we recognized that there were substantial reductions in prescription reimbursement rates that would have to be overcome.


Table of Contents

        Our Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (which consists of Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations plus Adjusted EBITDA from the stores sold to Walgreens up to each store's respective sale date), for short-term incentive calculation purposes, for fiscal year 2019 was $563 million, which was below our annual plan target of $645 million, but above the threshold performance level of $548 million. Based on performance against the goal, and as described in more detail below under "Cash Incentive Bonuses," our Named Executive Officers were paid bonuses at 58% of target for fiscal year 2019 performance. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of our Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP measure, to net income under GAAP.

        With respect to long-term performance awards, a return on net asset ratio continued to be a component of the performance assessment. The Compensation Committee believes that return on net assets is a key indicator of our corporate performance, as it measures how efficiently and effectively we deploy our assets (return on net assets) and focuses management on the need to improve the Company's financial condition over time. Additionally, the Compensation Committee has maintained a plan provision subjecting the long-term performance award to positive or negative modification based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 3000 Index over the three-year performance period.

        Our Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (which consists of Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations plus Adjusted EBITDA from the stores sold to Walgreens up to each store's respective sale date), for short-term incentive calculation purposes, for fiscal year 2018 was $818 million, which was below our annual plan target of $985 million, but above the threshold performance level of $640 million. Based on performance against the adjusted goal, and as described in more detail below under "Cash Incentive Bonuses," our Named Executive Officers were paid bonuses at 74.8% of target for fiscal year 2018 performance. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of our Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP measure, to net income under GAAP.


Table of Contents

The performance targets for the long-term incentive awards granted to our Named Executive Officers in the form of performance stock in fiscal year 20182019 are discussed in detail below. See "Long-Term Incentive Program—Performance Awards" on pages 4847 to 50.49.

Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program

        All of our executive compensation and benefits programs are within the purview of the Compensation Committee, which bases these programs on the same objectives that guide the Company in establishing all of its compensation programs. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company's equity incentive compensation plans. In establishing or approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers in any given year, the Compensation Committee is generally guided by the following objectives:


Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee's Processes

        The Compensation Committee has established a number of processes to assist it in ensuring that the Company's executive compensation program is achieving its objectives. Among those are:

        Assessment of Company performance.    The Compensation Committee uses Company performance measures in two ways.

        First, in assessing the linkage between actual total compensation and performance, the Compensation Committee considers various measures of Company and industry performance, such as comparable store sales growth, EBITDA growth, return on sales, debt leverage


Table of Contents

ratios, return on average invested capital and net assets, and total stockholder return. In determining performance relative to the Company's peer group (as discussed further below), the Compensation Committee does not apply a formula or assign these performance measures relative weights. Instead, it makes a subjective determination after considering such measures collectively.

        Second, as described in more detail below, the Compensation Committee has established specific Company target incentive/award levels and performance measures that determine the size of payouts under the Company's two formula-based incentive programs—the annual cash incentive bonus program and performance awards granted under the Company's long-term incentive program.

        Assessment of competitive compensation levels.    The Compensation Committee, with the help of its independent compensation consultant Exequity LLP, assesses the Company's programs relative to a peer group of retail organizations and published survey data. The peer group, updated forin fiscal year 2018 to reflect the projected declinereduction in the scopesize of Rite Aid's operationsAid following the planned divestiture of stores and distribution centers to WBA, was approved by the Compensation Committee in September 2017 after a comprehensive review. Because the Company has a limited number of publicly-traded direct competitors and because pharmacy sales (which account for over two-thirds of the Company's revenue) are governed by third-party contracts, we reviewed potential peers relative to multiple criteria including:


Table of Contents

        The resulting peer companies, which are considered to be the best representation of our target labor market, are listed below.


Table of Contents


Fiscal Year 20182019 Peer Group

Peer Company
 Revenues
($ Millions)
 

CVS Health CorporationCorp

  184,765 

WalgreenWalgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. 

  124,028120,453 

Best Buy Co., Inc. 

  42,151 

Macy's, Inc. 

  24,837 

Dollar General Corp. 

  23,471 

Dollar Tree, Inc. 

  22,246 

AutoNation, Inc. 

  21,535 

Kohl's Corporation

  19,095 

Sears Holdings Corp. 

  16,702 

SupervaluSuperValu, Inc. 

  14,649 

J.C. Penney Company, Inc. 

  12,506 

Henry Schein, Inc. 

12,462

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 

  12,34912,167 

DaVita Inc. 

  10,877

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

10,44110,884 

Office Depot Inc. 

  10,240 

LabCorp Holdings

10,206

Owens & Minor, Inc. 

  9,3189,686

        The peer group was further reviewed, updated, and approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2019 to reflect the changes in the peer group, as a result of mergers and delisting of certain members of the fiscal year 2019 peer group, and further consideration of relevant size using Company comparisons to revenue, market capitalization, and EBITDA. Among other changes, we decided to remove CVS Health Corp. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. from the peer group, even though each organization is a direct competitor from both business and talent acquisition perspectives, because the Compensation Committee determined that these organizations are no longer appropriate peers given their significantly larger scope of operations.


Updated Fiscal Year 2020 Peer Group(1)

Peer Company
Revenues
($ Millions)

Best Buy Co., Inc. 

43,441

Macy's, Inc. 

25,141

Dollar General Corp. 

25,105

Dollar Tree, Inc. 

22,979

AutoNation, Inc. 

21,685

Kohl's Corporation

19,474

The Gap. 

16,735

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

14,060

Community Health Systems, Inc. 

13,760

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 

12,437

J.C. Penney Company, Inc. 

12,001

DaVita Inc. 

11,365

Office Depot Inc. 

10,928

Owens & Minor, Inc. 

9,686 

Note:(1)
Revenue reflects trailing 12-month data through February 2018 as available per Standard & Poor's Capital IQ.

Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee compares the compensation levels of Rite Aid's Named Executive Officers to peer company compensation levels in the aggregate, and also compares the pay of individual executives if the jobs are sufficiently similar to make the comparison meaningful. Had the updated fiscal year 2020 peer group been used for all fiscal year 2019 compensation decisions, the analysis would have supported like decisions being made.

        In addition to peer group data, the Compensation Committee reviews market data based on specific functional responsibility for each executive from published survey data. The survey analysis targets data from similarly-sizedsimilarly sized retail organizations based on each executive's functional responsibility. The surveys used in the analysis include Mercer's20172018 Executive Remuneration Suite, Mercer's20172018 Retail Compensation and Benefits Survey and, and Towers Watson's20172018 Survey Report on Top Management Compensation.

        The Compensation Committee uses peer group and survey data primarily to ensure that the executive compensation program as a whole is competitive, meaning generally within 25% of the median range of comparative pay of the market when Rite Aid achieves the targeted performance levels. The Compensation Committeeincentive plans were further designed the incentive plans in such a way that executives can earn above competitive levels for superior performance and below competitive levels if performance is below expectations. The Compensation Committee assesses overall alignment of the compensation program rather than benchmarking a specific target position with consideration of factors, such as Company and individual performance, how executive roles function within Rite Aid, concerns about executive retention, and availability of equity compensation. The Compensation Committee assesses Rite Aid's performance relative to its peer group on both a one- and three-year basis and observed alignment of performance with actual total direct compensation levels for the executives in the aggregate.

        In fiscal year 2018,2019, management engaged Mercer, a compensation consultant, to provide management with compensation information for certain executive officers. Pursuant to the terms of its retention, Mercer reported directly to management, and not to the Compensation Committee, although the Compensation Committee did review recommendations and an analysis prepared by management and Mercer in determining fiscal year 20182019 compensation for the Named Executive Officers.


Table of Contents

        Total compensation review.    The Compensation Committee reviews each named executive's base pay, annual bonus, and long-term incentives annually with the guidance of the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant. Following the fiscal year 20182019 review, the Compensation Committee determined that the target level and components of compensation for fiscal year 20182019 were competitive and reasonable in the aggregate.

Components of Executive Compensation for Fiscal Year 20182019

        For fiscal year 2018,2019, the regular compensation program for our Named Executive Officers consisted of four primary components: (i) base salary, (ii) a cash incentive bonus opportunity under the Company's annual incentive bonus plan, (iii) long-term incentives consisting of restricted stock and performance-based restricted stockcash units, and (iv) a benefits package, including a Supplemental Executive Retirement Programsupplemental executive retirement program ("SERP"). The Company terminated the SERP as of March of 2019. A significant portion of total compensation under the fiscal year 2019 program is variable, meaning a significant portion is subject to performance and is comprised of target annual incentives and target long-term incentives.

        The Compensation Committee believes that this program was intended to appropriately balancesbalance the mix of cash and equity compensation, the mix of currently-paid and longer-term compensation, and the security of base benefits in a way that best furthers the compensation objectives discussed above. The chart below shows the overall mix of base salary, target annual incentives, target long-term incentives, and contributions under the SERP for Messrs. Standley, Crawford, Karst, Everett, Montini and Ms. Konrad.


Table of Contents


Target Total Remuneration(1)

Compensation Component as a % of Total Remuneration for Fiscal Year 20182019

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
Target Total Remuneration represents the sum of base salary, target annual incentives, target long-term incentives, and SERP contributions. Target Total Compensation does not include (i) the value of broad-based benefits provided to all employees, (ii) components of all other compensation (except the SERP) shown in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iii) retention awards. The Company terminated the SERP as of March of 2019.

Realized Long-Term Incentive Awards

        A significant portion of our long-term incentive awards are subject to performance metrics. This is an important aspect of our Named Executive Officers' and other executives' compensation aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. While equity-based awards are reported in the summary compensation table at target value in the year granted, the value realized is dependent on the actual performance over the measurement period. The realized value from our performance-based long-term


Table of Contents

equity awards where the measurement period ended during the current reported results are as noted in the chart below.

 
  
  
 Standley(1)
  
 Crawford(2)
  
 Karst
  
 Everett(3)
  
 Konrad(4)
  

 

 

Total Target Value of Performance Awards Reported in Summary Compensation Table in fiscal years 2015 - 2017

   $16,986,250   n/a   $1,915,750   $345,938   n/a  

 

 

Total Realized Value in fiscal years 2017 - 2019 of Performance Awards Reported in Compensation Summary Compensation Table in fiscal years 2015 - 2017

   
$

2,661,291
   

n/a

   
$

   
$

   

n/a

  

(1)
Mr. Standley's results include the special performance award granted in fiscal year 2016 related to the integration of EnvisionRx, which was realized in July 2017 with a then market value of $2,661,291.

(2)
Mr. Crawford was first employed by Rite Aid in fiscal year 2018 and did not receive any performance awards for fiscal years 2015-2017.

(3)
Mr. Everett's results reflect compensation reported for fiscal year 2017 only, the year in which he became a Named Executive Officer.

(4)
Ms. Konrad was not a Named Executive Officer for fiscal years 2015-2017.

Base Salary

        Base salary is one element of an executive's annual cash compensation during employment. The value of base salary reflects the executive's long-term performance, skill set, and the market value of


Table of Contents

that skill set. In setting base salaries for fiscal year 2018,2019, the Compensation Committee considered the following factors:

        Pay levels at comparable companies.    As noted above, the Compensation Committee uses peer group data to test for the reasonableness and competitiveness of base salaries, but it also exercises subjective judgment in view of the Company's compensation objectives.

        Internal relativity.    Meaning the relative pay differences for different job levels.

        Individual performance.    Except for increases associated with promotions or increased responsibility, increases in base salary for executives from year to year are generally limited to minimal adjustments to reflect individual performance.

        Consideration of the mix of overall compensation.    Consistent with our compensation objectives, as executives progress to higher levels in the organization, a greater proportion of overall compensation is directly linked to Company performance and stockholder returns. Mr. Standley's overalltarget total compensation, for example, is more heavily weighted toward short- and long-term incentive compensation (approximately 85% in the aggregate as shown in the bar chart above) than that of the other Named Executive Officers.

        The Compensation Committee reviewed the Named Executive Officers' base salaries in April of fiscal year 20182019 and considered the principles described above under "The Compensation Committee's


Table of Contents

Processes" in establishing the Named Executive Officers' base salaries for the fiscal year as noted in the chart below. In addition to the annual performance increases, Bryan B. Everett and Jocelyn Z. Konrad were awarded an additional increase in September in connection with the promotion to Chief Operating Officer, Rite Aid Stores, and an additional merit increase, respectively.

Executive
 Base Salary at
End of FY 2018
 Increase or
Change from
Prior Fiscal Year
 Rationale

John T. Standley

 $1,220,550 3.0% Performance

Kermit Crawford(a)

 $1,000,000 N/A New hire(a)

Darren W. Karst

 $830,250 2.5% Performance

Bryan B. Everett

 $600,000 30.0% Performance & Promotion

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

 $450,000 12.5% Performance and Merit

Enio A. Montini, Jr.(b)

 $481,440 2.1% Performance

(a)
Effective October 2, 2017, Mr. Crawford was hired as President and Chief Operating Officer.

(b)
Mr. Montini retired from the Company on December 15, 2017.
Executive
 Base Salary at
End of FY 2018
 Increase or
Change from
Prior Fiscal Year
 Rationale

John T. Standley

 $1,220,550   Potential merger

Kermit Crawford

 $1,000,000   Potential merger

Darren W. Karst

 $850,750  2.5%Performance

Bryan B. Everett

 $618,000  3.0%Performance

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

 $461,250  2.5%Performance

Cash Incentive Bonuses

        The Company established an annual incentive plan in order to incentivize the Named Executive Officers to meet the Company's Adjusted EBITDA target for fiscal year 2018.2019. The Compensation Committee establishes a target percentage of salary for each participant at the beginning of the fiscal year and approves the financial goals required for the Company to pay an award. Payouts for the Named Executive Officers are then determined by the Company's financial results for the year relative to the predetermined performance measures. As shown in the Summary Compensation Table under "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation," incentives were paid to Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 20182019 performance.

        Bonus targets.    Targets for each Named Executive Officer were determined based on job responsibilities, internal relativity, and peer group and survey data. The Compensation Committee's objective was to set bonus targets such that total annual cash compensation (including base salary and


Table of Contents

annual incentive assuming a target payout) was generally aligned with the market with a substantial portion of that compensation linked to corporate performance. Consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, individuals with greater job responsibilities had a greater proportion of their total cash compensation tied to Company performance through the incentive plan. The Compensation Committee, as a result, established the following targets for fiscal year 2018:2019:


Annual Incentive Opportunity

Executive
 Threshold Payout
(as a % of Salary)
 Target Payout
(as a % of Salary)
 Maximum Payout
(as a % of Salary)
 

John T. Standley

  100% 200% 400%

Kermit Crawford(a)

  87.5% 175% 350%

Darren W. Karst

  62.5% 125% 250%

Bryan B. Everett(b)

  44.5% 89% 178%

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

  37.5% 75% 150%

Enio A. Montini, Jr.(c)

  37.5% 75% 150%

(a)
The amount of annual incentive opportunity earned by Mr. Crawford was pro-rated based on his start date effective October 2, 2017 until the end of fiscal year 2018.

(b)
Effective as of September 6, 2017, the target payout (as a percentage of annual base salary) for Mr. Everett was increased to 100% in connection with his promotion to his current role. The amount of annual incentive opportunity earned by Mr. Everett was pro-rated such that the target payout of 100% was applied from September 6, 2017 until the end of fiscal year 2018.

(c)
Mr. Montini received a pro-rated portion of his annual incentive based on the earned amount for the fiscal year pro-rated for the number of accounting periods (full months in the fiscal year) before his retirement on December 15, 2017.
Executive
 Threshold Payout
(as a % of Salary)
 Target Payout
(as a % of Salary)
 Maximum Payout
(as a % of Salary)
 

John T. Standley

  100% 200% 400%

Kermit Crawford

  87.5% 175% 350%

Darren W. Karst

  62.5% 125% 250%

Bryan B. Everett

  50% 100% 200%

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

  37.5% 75% 150%

        The Compensation Committee believes that using Adjusted EBITDA as the measure for the annual incentive plan appropriately encourages officers, including the Named Executive Officers, to focus on improving operating results which ultimately drive stockholder value. EBITDA growth has historically shown a strong positive correlation with three-year and five-year total stockholder return for Rite Aid and its peer group. The majority of Rite Aid's peer companies use an EBITDA measure in their annual incentive plans. Based on Rite Aid's current financial situation and capital structure, the Compensation Committee believes that Adjusted EBITDA is the best indicator of Rite Aid's operating performance. The measure is tracked regularly and is clearly understood by the officers. Officers can impact the measure by taking actions to improve the operating performance of our stores. In addition, the Company regularly communicates Adjusted EBITDA to the investment community.


Table of Contents

        Under the plan formula, payouts can range from 0% to 200% of bonus targets depending on Company performance. The Compensation Committee initially established an Adjusted EBITDA performance target of $1,022$645 million for fiscal year 2018,2019, based on the then-current financial plan targets. This performance level target, based on the financial plan, was below15% above our fiscal year 20172018 performance of $1,137 million as a result$560 million. Because of continuingthe recognized prescription reimbursement rate pressure andchallenges, the fact that fiscal year 2018 had one (1) less week than fiscal year 2017. The Compensation Committee also established in the performance target for fiscal year 2019 a threshold at which management could be rewarded at 50% of bonus target at achievement of Adjusted EBITDA of $869$548 million (85% of target), and the Compensation Committee approved a maximum at which management could be rewarded at 200% of bonus target at achievement of Adjusted EBITDA of $1,124$710 million (110% of target).

        At its July 2017 meeting, the Compensation Committee re-evaluated the likelihood of achieving Adjusted EBITDA results above the threshold performance of $869 million after termination of the


Table of Contents

WBA merger agreement and execution of the subsequent asset sale to divest stores and distribution centers to WBA. During this meeting, the Compensation Committee determined based on the projected financial impact of the loss of certain pharmacy services contracts and the Company being excluded from certain pharmacy networks in which it participated last year, that such level of performance was extremely unlikely to be attained. Accordingly, in the interest of maintaining a strong incentive aligned with short-term performance following considerable ongoing challenges and uncertainty related to the extended duration of the potential WBA merger process, as well as no payments and projected below-target or no payments under recent and in-cycle annual and long-term performance incentives, the Compensation Committee lowered the threshold level of performance at which management could be rewarded with a bonus of 50% of target, and approved a threshold Adjusted EBITDA of $664 million (65% of target). At the same time, the Compensation Committee also decided to increase the maximum level of performance at which management could be rewarded at 200% of bonus target, and approved a maximum Adjusted EBITDA goal of $1,380 million (135% of target).

        Finally, in February 2018, the Compensation Committee modified the annual incentive performance framework to reflect the impact of the reduction of Adjusted EBITDA resulting from the divestiture of stores to WBA. Specifically, the Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA target was reduced by $37 million to $985 million, threshold Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA remained 65% of target (reduced to $640 million), and maximum Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA remained 135% of target ($1,330 million).

In fiscal year 2018,2019, challenges associated withcaused by the extended durationuncertainty of the WBAproposed Albertsons merger process and its ultimate termination, the asset sale, as well as the impactultimate termination of the loss of certain pharmacy services contracts and being excluded from certain pharmacy networks in which we participated last yearmerger agreement, the WBA Transactions, as well as continued prescription reimbursement rate pressures all had a substantial negative impact on our fiscal year 20182019 results, and Rite Aid's actual Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA was $818$563 million, which was below the revised target performance level, but above the revised threshold performance level, resulting in bonus payments at 74.8%58% of the revisedperformance target. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA consists of Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations plus Adjusted EBITDA from the stores sold to Walgreens up to each store's respective sale date. As discussed in greater detail in Appendix A, we define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) excluding the impact of income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, LIFO adjustments, charges or credits for facility closing and impairment, goodwill impairment, inventory write-downs related to store closings, debt retirements, the WBA merger termination fee, and other items (including stock-based compensation expense, merger and acquisition-related costs, severance and costs related to distribution center closures, gain or loss on sale of assets, and revenue deferrals related to our customer loyalty program). We reference this particular non-GAAP financial measure not only as a basis for incentive compensation but also in our corporate decision-making because it provides supplemental information that facilitates internal comparisons to the historical operating performance of prior periods and external comparisons to competitors' historical operating performance.


Fiscal Year 20182019 Annual Incentive Plan Performance Goal

Performance Level
 Adjusted EBITDA
Goal (millions)
 Resulting Payout
as a % of
Target Award
  Adjusted EBITDA
Goal (millions)
 Resulting Payout
as a % of
Target Award
 

Threshold

 $640 50% $548 50%

Target

 $985 100% $645 100%

Maximum

 $1,330 200% $710 200%

Actual Performance

 $818 74.8% $563 58%

Table of Contents

Long-Term Incentive Program

        Crawford Onboarding Grant.    In connection with joining the Company on October 2, 2017 as President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Crawford received 1,000,000 stock options that will vest in four equal annual installments, and 975,610 restricted shares that will vest in three equal annual installments. Mr. Crawford did not otherwise participate in the long-term incentive program set forth below.

        Long-term incentive target opportunity.    The purpose of the regular long-term incentive program is to support the long-term perspective necessary for continued success in our business and focus our Named Executive Officers on creating long-term, sustainable stockholder value. Our annual long-term


Table of Contents

incentive (LTI) targets("LTI") target opportunities for each Named Executive Officer as of the date of grant July 17, 2017on January 4, 2019 are shown below:


Long-Term Incentive TargetsTarget Opportunities

Executive
 Target Opportunity
(as a % of Salary)
 

John T. Standley

  500%

Kermit Crawford(a)Crawford

  425%

Darren W. Karst(b)Karst

  250%

Bryan B. Everett(b)Everett

  200%

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

  150%

Enio A. Montini, Jr.(c)

150%

(a)
Mr. Crawford's long-term incentive target will apply beginning in fiscal year 2019. Following his start date of October 2, 2017, Mr. Crawford received 1,000,000 stock options and 975,610 restricted shares, but did not otherwise participate in the long-term incentive program for fiscal year 2018.

(b)
Subsequent to the July 17, 2017 LTI grant, the Compensation Committee recommended and subsequently approved an increase to Mr. Karst's and Mr. Everett's LTI target percentage to 250% and 200%, respectively.

(c)
Mr. Montini forfeited any LTI granted to him on July 17, 2017 with his retirement on December 15, 2017.

        The Compensation Committee reviewed available peer group data and found that the design of the long-term incentive program is reasonably aligned with general retail industry market practice. Target grant values for individual executive officers were established based on individual performance and internal relativity. Consistent with the Company's compensation philosophy, executive officers at higher levels received a greater proportion of total pay in the form of long-term incentives.

        Long-term incentive mix.    In fiscal year 20182019 we used the following types of awards:awards and increased the percentage of the award that is subject to performance:

Vehicle
 Approximate
Proportion of 20182019
Long-Term
Incentive Target
Opportunity
 Purpose

Performance-Based Restricted StockCash Units

  5070%Links compensation to multi-year operating results on key measures tied to stockholder value creation.

Restricted Stock

  5030%Supports retention and provides a vehicle with more stability and less risk. Aligns executive and stockholder interests and focuses executives on value creation.

Table of Contents

        In determining the overall mix of long-term incentive vehicles, the following factors were considered:

        The Compensation Committee's process for setting grant dates is discussed below. On the approval date, those values are converted to the equivalent number of shares based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of approval.


Table of Contents

        Grant timing.    The Compensation Committee has a policy that, in the normal course, annual long-term incentive awards (other than special or new hire grants) will be approved by the Compensation Committee once a year at its annual meeting held in connection with the annual stockholdersstockholders' meeting, with a grant date equal to the later of the second business day after release of the Company's first quarter earnings or the date of approval. Grants are made to the Named Executive Officers at the same time as awards are made to all other associates as part of the annual grant process. With the delay in our fiscal year 2018 annual stockholders meeting and the changing of board members, resulting in new members of the Compensation Committee, the Committee took action in its December, 2018 meeting to grant fiscal year 2019 awards with an effective date of January 4, 2019.

        Special awards.    From time to time, the Company may make grants in addition to the annual equity grant, including those to Named Executive Officers. Typically, these grants include awards to new hires, promotional awards, or retention awards. Special awards can also be utilized to provide special performance incentives in connection with specific corporate or financial goals of the Company. Other than a grant of restricted shares provided to Mr. Everett upon his promotion in September of 2017, as shown below in the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table For Fiscal Year 2018," noNo special awards were made to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2018.2019.

Performance Awards

        Performance awards granted to the Named Executive Officers under the regular long-term incentive program are in the form of units, which are denominated in a target number of shares and payable in Company stock or cash, if the designated, or are denominated with a target unit value equal to $1.00. Company performance goals are achievedestablished and achievable over the prescribed performance period. Payouts can range from 0% (for performance below threshold) to 250% of target (for performance at or above maximum). Performance awards are intended to align interests of executives with those of stockholders through the use of measures the Company believes drive its long-term success. Performance awards are normally granted annually and are structured as a targeted number of units based on the Company's achievement of specific performance levels with payout occurring after a three-year period.

        For the 2016 and 2017 performance award grants (the "2016-2018 Plan" and the "2017-2019 Plan"), the Compensation Committee based 80% of the award on the achievement of three-year (fiscal year 2016-fiscal year 2018 and fiscal year 2017-fiscal year 2019) cumulative Adjusted EBITDA goals and the remaining 20% on three-year (fiscal year 2016-fiscal year 2018 and fiscal year 2017-fiscal year 2019) return on net asset goals. The Compensation Committee also added a provision for each cycle, subjecting the award to modification based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 3000


Table of Contents

Index over the respective three-year measuring periods. The Compensation Committee believes this provision further aligns the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and adds an additional incentive for them to create sustainable long-term value for the Company.

        For the 2018 performance award grants ("2018-2020 Plan"), the Compensation Committee also based 80% of the award on the achievement of Adjusted EBITDA goals and the remaining 20% on return on net assets performance. However, due to the significant uncertainty during the transition of our business in 2018, the 2018-2020 Plan financial performance goals are based on the accumulation of one-year goals set for 2019 and 2020 only. As in prior cycles, the Compensation Committee added a provision subjecting the award to modification based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 3000 Index over the full 2018-2020 performance period.

        2016-2018 Plan.    Under the 2016-2018 Plan, participants have the opportunity to earn shares of Rite Aid stock, contingent on cumulative Company financial performance for the three-year period spanning fiscal year 2016 through fiscal year 2018. Such financial performance is based 80% on the Adjusted EBITDA goals and 20% on return on net asset goals. The Compensation Committee set a three-year cumulative target for both metrics. In addition, in order to further align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and add an additional incentive for them to create sustainable long-term value for the Company, the Compensation Committee also determined to subject the award to modification of +/– 25% based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 3000 Index over the three-year measuring period. For fiscal years 2016-2018, actual Adjusted EBITDA of $3,357 million was below the three-year performance threshold of $3,618 million. Actual return on net assets was 2.4% compared to a target of 18.6%. Accordingly, no awards were earned under the 2016-2018 Plan.

        2017-2019 Plan.Under the 2017-2019 Plan, participants havehad the opportunity to earn shares of Rite Aid stock, contingent on cumulative Company financial performance for the three-year period spanning fiscal year 2017-fiscal year 2019. Such financial performance is based 80% on the Adjusted EBITDA goals and 20% on return on net asset goals. In addition, in order to further align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and add an additional incentive for them to create sustainable long-term value for the Company, the Compensation Committee also determined to subject the award to modification of +/–25% based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 3000 Index over the three-year measuring period. For fiscal years 2017-2019, actual Adjusted EBITDA of $1,871 million was below the three-year performance threshold of $3,135 million. Actual return on net assets was 1.5% compared to a target of 5.1%. Accordingly, no awards were earned under the 2017-2019 Plan.


Table of Contents

        For the 2018 performance award grants ("2018-2020 Plan.Plan"), the Compensation Committee also based 80% of the award on the achievement of Adjusted EBITDA goals and the remaining 20% on return on net assets performance. However, due to the significant uncertainty during the transition of our business in 2018, the 2018-2020 Plan financial performance goals are based on the accumulation of one-year goals set for 2019 and 2020 only. As in prior cycles, the Compensation Committee added a provision subjecting the award to modification based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 3000 Index over the full 2018-2020 performance period.

        Under the 2018-2020 Plan, participants have the opportunity to earn cash payments after the end of fiscal year 2020, contingent on performance relative to accumulated one-year Company financial performance goals for each of fiscal year 2019 and fiscal year 2020. Such financial performance is based 80% on the Adjusted EBITDA goals and 20% on return on net asset goals. The value of a unit is tied to the stock price with a maximum value of 300% of the grant date stock price. This aligns the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. In addition, in order to further align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and add an additional incentive for them to create sustainable long-term value for the Company, the Compensation Committee also determined to subject the award to modification of +/– 25% based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 3000 Index over the three-year vesting period.

        For the 2019 performance award grants ("2019-2021 Plan"), the Compensation Committee also based 80% of the award on the achievement of Adjusted EBITDA goals and the remaining 20% on return on net assets performance. However, due to the delay in grant timing and the significant uncertainty during the transition of our business in 2019, as well as prescription reimbursement rate challenges, the 2019-2021 Plan financial performance goals are based on the accumulation of one-year goals set for 2020 and 2021 only. As in prior cycles, the Compensation Committee added a provision subjecting the award to modification based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 3000 Index over the full 2019-2021 performance period.

        Under the 2019-2021 Plan, participants have the opportunity to earn cash payments after the end of fiscal year 2021, contingent on performance relative to accumulated one-year Company financial performance goals for each of fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2021. Such financial performance is based 80% on the Adjusted EBITDA goals and 20% on return on net asset goals. The value of a unit is equal to $1.00. These performance targets align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. In addition, in order to further align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and add an additional incentive for them to create sustainable long-term value for the Company, the Compensation Committee also determined to subject the award to modification of +/– 25% based on our relative stockholder return versus the Russell 3000 Index over the three-year vesting period. As shown in the table below, payouts can range from 0% (for performance below threshold) to 250% of the target number of units (for performance at or above maximum). 37.5% of the target unit award can be earned for performance at threshold levels.


Table of Contents


2018-20202019-2021 Plan: Performance-Based Restricted StockPerformance Units

Executive(a)
 Target
Award
($)
 Threshold
Award
(# of Units)
 Target
Award
(# of Units)
 Maximum
Award
(# of Units)
 
Executive(a)
 Threshold
Award
($)
 Target
Award
($)
 Maximum
Award
($)
 

John T. Standley(1)

 3,051,279 495,338 1,320,900 3,302,250  $1,601,963 $4,271,900 $10,679,750 

Darren W. Karst

 830,214 134,775 359,400 898,500 

Kermit Crawford(2)

 $1,115,625 $2,975,000 $7,437,500 

Darren W. Karst(2)

 $558,300 $1,488,800 $3,722,000 

Bryan B. Everett

 356,200 77,100 154,200 385,500  $324,450 $865,200 $2,163,000 

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

 309,078 50,175 133,800 334,500  $181,613 $484,300 $1,210,750 

Enio A. Montini, Jr.(b)

 361,053 58,613 156,300 390,750 

(a)(1)
Because Mr. Standley will forfeit this award upon his departure from the Company.

(2)
Mr. Crawford did not commence employmentforfeited this award with his departure from the Company until afteron March 12, 2019, and Mr. Karst forfeited this award upon his departure from the date the 2018-2020 Plan was established, he did not participate in the 2018-2020 Plan. On his October 2, 2017 start date, Mr. Crawford received 1,000,000 stock options and 975,610 restricted shares.

(b)
Mr. Montini forfeited his 2018-2020 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units with his retirementCompany on December 15, 2017.May 31, 2019.

Restricted Stock

        Restricted stock grants are intended to support retention of executives and focus them on long-term performance because they generally vest over a multi-year period (three years or longer) and are tied to the value of our stock. The risk profile of restricted stock is aligned with stockholders, as it can motivate executives to both increase and preserve stock price. The table below summarizes 20182019 restricted stock awards:


20182019 Restricted Stock Awards

Executive
 Award Value
($)
 # of Shares  Award Value
($)
 # of Shares 

John T. Standley

 $3,051,375 1,320,900  $1,830,829 118,885 

Kermit Crawford(a)(1)

 $2,000,000 975,610  $1,274,966 82,790 

Darren W. Karst(2)

 $830,249 359,400  $638,099 41,435 

Bryan B. Everett(b)

 $1,324,202 554,200  $370,832 24,080 

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

 $309,000 133,800  $207,592 13,480 

Enio A. Montini, Jr.(c)

 $361,080 156,300 

(a)(1)
On his October 2, 2017 start date, Mr. Crawford received 975,610 restricted shares as shown.

(b)
On his September 6, 2017 promotion to Chief Operating Officer, Rite Aid Stores, Mr. Everett received 400,000 restricted shares.

(c)
Mr. Montini forfeited his 2018 restricted stockthis award with his retirementdeparture from the Company on December 15, 2017.March 12, 2019.

(2)
Mr. Karst forfeited a portion of this award pursuant to his separation agreement upon his departure from the Company on May 31, 2019.

Winding Down Retention Efforts in Fiscal Year 20182019

        Rite Aid had entered into individual retention agreements for our Named Executive Officers (excluding Messrs. Standley and Crawford) and other key officers who are not Named Executive Officers in coordination with the WBA merger agreement, as previously disclosed. These awards, which were to be paid 120 days after completion of the merger based on the completion and continued employment, were not paid out because the merger condition was not satisfied. With the termination of


Table of Contents

the WBA merger agreement, the Compensation Committee determined to provide new retention awards for an amount equal to approximately one half of the original retention amount payable on November 1, 2017, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table. This award was viewed as honoring a commitment to the leaders related to the merger, the completion of which was outside their control.

        In addition to the fiscal year 2018 regular compensation program for the Named Executive Officers, Rite Aid hasalso entered into individual retention agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers, as well as other key officersassociates who are not named executive officers, to enhance employee retention and promote corporate performance, amidst significant volatility and uncertainty related to restructuring the company. The outstanding retention agreements with each Named Executive Officer, other than Messrs. Standley and Crawford, generally provideprovided for the lump-sum payment of the retention awards


(a)
Because Mr. Crawford did not commence employment with the Company until after the date the 2018- 2020 Plan was established, he did not participate in the 2018-2020 Plan. As previously disclosed, on his October 2, 2017 start date, Mr. Crawford received 1,000,000 stock options and 975,610 restricted shares.

Table of Contents

in equal installments on August 1, 2018 and May 1, 2019, subject to continued employment through such retention date or upon an earlier qualifying termination.

        The retention agreement with Mr. Crawford generally providesprovided for the lump-sum payment of the retention award on October 1, 2019, subject to continued employment through such retention date or an earlier qualifying termination of employment. Mr. Crawford forfeited this award with his departure on March 12, 2019.

        The retention agreement with Mr. Standley generally providesprovided for the lump-sum payment of the retention award (x) on the completion of the Albertson's Mergermerger if Mr. Standley has not been appointed to serve as chief executive officer of the combined company or (y) on the date that the Rite Aid Board of Directors determines that the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement will not be consummated, in each case, subject to continued employment through each such retention date or an earlier qualifying termination of employment. Due to the termination of the Merger Agreement on August 8, 2018, Mr. Standley received the $3,000,000 retention payment to which he was entitled under his retention agreement.

        Under the remaining retention agreements granted in fiscal year 2018, in the aggregate, Mr. Crawford could earn a retention payment of $1,000,000, Mr. Karst could earnearned a retention payment of $830,250, Mr. Everett could earnearned a retention payment of $600,000 and Ms. Konrad could earnearned a retention payment of $450,000. Fifty percent50% of the retention amount for each officer, other than Mr.Messers. Standley and Crawford, was paid in fiscal year 2019 based on continued employment on August 1, 2018, and the remaining 50% was paid based on continued employment on AugustMay 1, 2018.2019.

        Based on stockholder discussions and clarity around the business strategy, Rite Aid did not enter into any new individual retention agreements for any of the Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2019 and does not believe it will enter into any new retention agreements in fiscal year 2020.

Post-Retirement Benefits

        Supplemental Executive Retirement Program.    EachDuring fiscal year 2019, each of the Named Executive Officers receivesreceived benefits under a defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan.plan or SERP. Under the SERP, Rite Aid creditscredited each participant with a specific sum to an individual account established for theeach participant, on a monthly basis while the participant is employed. The amount credited iswas equal to 2% of the executive officer'sparticipant's annual base compensation. The participants are able to select among a choice of earnings indexes, and their accounts are credited with earnings that mirror the investment results of such indexes. Participants vestvested in their accounts at the rate of 20% per year for each calendar year of participation in the SERP at a five-year rolling rate with the entire account balance for each participant vesting upon death or total disability of the participant, termination without cause during the 12-month period following a "change in control" of the Company as defined in the SERP or upon termination of employment at age 60 or greater with at least five years of participation in the SERP. Effective February 25, 2019, the Company terminated the SERP such that there will be no future contributions or accruals as of March 2019. Existing SERP benefits have been fully vested and will be paid out in accordance with plan terms. SERP payments may be delayed due to certain tax rules or deferral elections made by the executive.

Other Post-Employment and Change in Control Benefits

        To attract and retain highly skilled executives and to provide for certainty of rights and obligations, Rite Aid has historically provided employment agreements to its executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers. The terms of the employment agreements are described in more detail under the caption "Executive Employment Agreements." Additional information regarding the severance and change in control benefits provided under the employment agreements is described under the section entitled "Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control."


Table of Contents

Deductibility Cap on Executive Compensation

        The Compensation Committee is aware that Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), treats certain elements of executive compensation in excess of $1,000,000 a year payable to our Chief Executive Officer and three other most highly compensated executives (and, effective beginning in 2018, our Chief Financial Officer) as an expense not deductible by the Company for federal income tax purposes. The exception providing that payments to these individuals in excess of the $1,000,000 limit will be deductible if such payments are performance-based was repealed beginning in 2018, as further described below.

        H.R.1, formally known as the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act," enacted on December 22, 2017, substantially modifies Section 162(m) by, among other things, eliminating the performance-based exception to the $1 million deduction limit effective as of January 1, 2018. As a result, beginning in 2018, compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers in excess of $1 million will generally be nondeductible, whether or not it is performance-based. While the Compensation Committee plans to continue taking actions intended to limit the impact of Section 162(m), it also believes that tax deductibility is only one of several relevant considerations in setting compensation. Therefore, in order to maintain the flexibility to provide compensation programs for our Named Executive Officers that will best incentivize them to achieve our key business objectives and create sustainable long-term stockholder value, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to pay compensation that may not be deductible to the Company if it determines that doing so would be in the best interests of the Company.

        H.R.1 also includes a transition rule under which the changes to Section 162(m) described above will not apply to compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and is not subsequently materially modified. To the extent applicable to our existing contracts and awards, the Compensation Committee may choose to avail itself of the transition rule.

Policy Regarding Recoupment of Certain Compensation

        The Company has adopted a formal compensation recovery or "clawback" policy for its executive officers, including all Named Executive Officers. Pursuant to this policy, the Board of Directors may seek to recoup certain incentive compensation, including cash bonuses and equity incentive awards paid based upon the achievement of financial performance metrics, from executives in the event that the Company is required to restate its financial statements.

Prohibition on Margin Accounts and Hedging and Similar Transactions

        Our executive officers and directors, including the Named Executive Officers, are subject to an insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits them from holding Company securities in a margin account, and also prohibits them from engaging in put or call options, short selling, or similar hedging activities involving our stock. We prohibit these transactions because they may reduce the individual's incentive to improve our performance, focus the individual on short-term performance at the expense of long-term objectives, and misalign the individual's interests with those of our stockholders generally.

Director and Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

        In June 2014, we revised ourOur Stock Ownership Guidelines have been established in order to further the investment of our non-management directors, executive officers, and Senior Vice Presidents in the success of the


Table of Contents

Company and to encourage a long-term perspective in managing the Company. TheDuring the 2019 fiscal


Table of Contents

year, except for the Non-Management Directors which increased from two to five times annual cash retainer in our January 2019 board meeting, the stock ownership requirements are:were as follows:

Position
 Minimum Ownership Requirements (Number of Share Equivalents)
Chief Executive Officer lesser of 1,400,000 share equivalents or 5 times base salary
President(1) lesser of 700,000 share equivalents or 3 times base salary
Senior Executive Vice Presidents lesser of 700,000 share equivalents or 3 times base salary
Executive Vice Presidents lesser of 200,000 share equivalents or 2 times base salary
Senior Vice Presidents lesser of 100,000 share equivalents or 1 times base salary
Non-Management Directors(2) lesser of 150,000 share equivalents or 25 times annual cash retainer

(1)
If the President is also the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Executive Officer amount shallwill apply.

(2)
Other than an Executive Chairman, who shallwill be subject to the same requirement as the Chief Executive Officer.

        Effective as of April 10, 2019, we have revised our stock ownership guidelines to remove the reference to a specific number of shares to be held. The current stock ownership requirements are:

Position
Minimum Ownership Requirements

Chief Executive Officer

5 times base salary

Chief Operating Officer

3 times base salary

Senior Executive Vice Presidents

3 times base salary

Executive Vice Presidents

2 times base salary

Senior Vice Presidents

1 times base salary

Non-Management Directors

5 times annual cash retainer

        Newly appointed or promoted executives who are or become subject to our Stock Ownership Guidelines and newly elected non-management directors have five years from the time they are appointed, promoted, or elected, as the case may be, to meet the stock ownership requirements. Currently, all of our Named Executive Officers have achieved the minimum holding ownership requirement or have not yet served for five years.

        For the purposes of determining stock ownership levels, the following forms of equity interests in the Company are included:

        Restricted stock and restricted stock units, whether or not vested, and shares owned count as one (1) share equivalent per share beneficially owned and stock options, whether or not vested, count as one-half (.5) share equivalent per stock option.

        The Compensation Committee is responsible for interpreting and administering the Stock Ownership Guidelines, and may, from time to time, reevaluate and revise the Stock Ownership Guidelines, including when there are changes to the Company's capital structure or where implementation of the Stock Ownership Guidelines would cause a non-management director, executive officer, or Senior Vice President to incur a hardship due to his or her unique financial circumstances.


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

        The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.


*
Mr. Bodaken served on the Compensation Committee throughout our 2019 fiscal year and until April 10, 2019. Ms. Katherine Quinn joined the Compensation Committee and the Board on April 10, 2019, but did not participate in the review or recommendation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Table of Contents


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

        The following summary compensation table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2019, March 3, 2018, and March 4, 2017, and February 27, 2016, respectively, paid to or earned by (i) our principal executive officer, (ii) our principal financial officer, and (iii) the three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company other than the principal executive officer or the principal financial officer who were serving at the end of the 2018 fiscal year and (iv) one former executive officer who would have been among the three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company if he had served as an executive officer at the end of the 20182019 fiscal year (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers").

Name and Principal Position(1)
 Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(1)
 Option
Awards
($)(1)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(2)
 Change In
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(3)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
 Total
($)
  Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)(2)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
 Change In
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(4)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
 Total
($)
 

John T. Standley

 2018 1,219,857  5,640,243  1,825,943 314,545 319,874 9,320,462  2019 1,220,550  1,830,829  1,440,249 53,994 3,320,207 7,865,829 

(CEO)

 2017 1,184,500  6,095,121   481,309 311,025 8,071,955  2018 1,219,857  5,640,243  1,825,943 314,545 319,874 9,320,462 

 2016 1,150,000  13,672,926 2,533,385 4,705,038 0 304,923 22,366,272  2017 1,184,500  6,095,121   481,309 311,025 8,071,955 

Kermit Crawford

 
2018
 
403,846
 
 
2,000,000
 
1,080,000
 
729,167
 
18,921
 
1,175,000
 
5,406,934
  
2019
 
1,000,000
 
 
1,274,966
 
 
1,032,500
 
 
252,000
 
3,559,466
 

(President & COO)

                    2018 403,846  2,000,000 1,080,000 729,167 18,921 1,175,000 5,406,934 

Darren W. Karst

 
2018
 
829,856
 
 
1,534,638
 
 
776,284
 
49,056
 
782,185
 
3,972,019
  
2019
 
850,356
 
 
638,099
 
 
627,428
 
 
707,424
 
2,823,306
 

(Senior Executive VP, CFO & CAO)

 2017 809,751  1,667,368   52,907 269,584 2,799,610 

 2016 790,005  1,009,008 695,980 924,136 0 279,138 3,698,267 

(Senior Executive VP,

 2018 829,856  1,534,638  776,284 49,056 782,185 3,972,019 

CFO & CAO)

 2017 809,751  1,667,368   52,907 269,584 2,799,610 

Bryan B. Everett

 
2018
 
533,784
 
 
1,626,434
 
 
392,700
 
17,891
 
413,475
 
2,984,284
  
2019
 
617,654
 
 
370,832
 
 
364,620
 
 
475,600
 
1,828,706
 

(COO, Rite Aid Stores)

 2017 461,250  712,768   16,768 151,086 1,341,872  2018 533,784  1,626,434  392,700 17,891 413,475 2,984,284 

 2017 461,250  712,768   16,768 151,086 1,341,872 

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

 
2018
 
427,846
 
 
571,326
 
 
252,450
 
33,665
 
124,000
 
1,409,287
  
2019
 
461,034
 
 
207,592
 
 
204,103
 
 
358,250
 
1,230,979
 

(Executive VP, Pharmacy)

                    2018 427,846  571,326  252,450 33,665 124,000 1,409,287 

Enio A. Montini, Jr.

 
2018
 
410,884
 
 
667,401
 
 
202,566
 
110,666
 
387,024
 
1,778,541
 

(Former Executive VP, Merchandising & Distribution)(5)

 2017 471,500  727,087   159,086 136,545 1,494,218 

 2016�� 450,303  418,548 288,805 658,332  131,225 1,947,213 

(1)
Mr. Standley entered into a separation agreement with the Company as of March 12, 2019 and, pursuant to that agreement, will remain in his current role until a successor is named or until his earlier termination. Mr. Crawford left the Company effective March 12, 2019. Mr. Karst entered into a separation agreement with the Company as of March 12, 2019 and pursuant to that agreement, left the Company as of May 31, 2019 after a transition period. For a description of the separation agreements entered into with Messrs. Standley, Crawford, and Karst, please see the narrative under the caption "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control."

(2)
The amounts reported reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of each stock award and option award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information regarding the assumptions used in determining the fair value of an award, please refer to Note 17 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 25, 2019, Note 17 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 26, 2018, and Note 16 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on May 3, 2017 and Note 16 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 25, 2016, as applicable. The 2018 stock award includes the grant date fair value of the performance awards at target, as shown in the chart below. Based upon the maximum level of achievement under the performance awards, the grant date fair value of such awards would increase for the Named Executive Officers as follows:2017.

Name
 Restricted
Stock
Award ($)
 Performance Award
Target
Performance ($)
 Total
Stock
Award ($)
 Max Performance
Award
Achievement ($)
 

Mr. Standley

  3,051,279  2,588,964  5,640,243  6,472,410 

Mr. Crawford

  2,000,000    2,000,000   

Mr. Karst

  830,214  704,424  1,534,638  1,761,060 

Mr. Everett

  1,324,202  302,232  1,626,434  755,580 

Ms. Konrad

  309,078  262,248  571,326  655,620 

Mr. Montini

  361,053  306,348  667,401  765,870 
(2)(3)
The amounts in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column for fiscal year 20182019 represent annual cash incentive bonuses for performance in fiscal year 2018.2019.

(3)(4)
Represents above-market earnings (over 120% of the "applicable federal rate"), if applicable, under the Company's defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plans.


Table of Contents

(4)(5)
The amounts in the "All Other Compensation" column for fiscal year 20182019 consist of the following:
Name
 Financial
Planning ($)
 Supplemental
Executive
Retirement
Plan
Allocations
($)
 Housing/
Transportation
Expenses
($)(A)
 Automobile
Allowance
($)
 401(k)
Matching
Contributions
($)
 Retention/
Inducement
Award Paid
($)
  Financial
Planning
($)
 Supplemental
Executive
Retirement
Plan
Allocations
($)
 Housing/
Transportation
Expenses
($)(a)
 Automobile
Allowance
($)
 401(k)
Matching
Contributions
($)
 Retention/
Inducement
Award Paid
($)
 

Mr. Standley

 6,305 290,769  12,000 10,800   4,275 292,932  12,000 11,000 3,000,000 

Mr. Crawford

  80,000 90,000 5,000  1,000,000   240,000  12,000   

Mr. Karst

 5,000 198,030 56,355 12,000 10,800 500,000  5,000 203,360 60,778 12,000 11,000 415,000 

Mr. Everett

 5,000 135,675  12,000 10,800 250,000  5,000 147,600  12,000 11,000 300,000 

Ms. Konrad

  101,200  12,000 10,800    110,250  12,000 11,000 225,000 

Mr. Montini

 1,275 114,949  10,000 10,800 250,000 

(A)(a)
Mr. Crawford and Mr. Karst areis reimbursed for certain housing and transportation expenses pursuant to their respectivehis employment agreements.agreement. The Company determines the incremental cost of said expenses based on the out-of-pocket amounts paid for rent, utilities, and travel.
(5)
Mr. Montini retired effective December 15, 2017.

Table of Contents


GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 20182019

        The following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards made to Named Executive Officers during our fiscal year ended March 3, 2018.2, 2019. As previously announced, we implemented a reverse stock split of our common stock at a reverse stock split ratio of 1-for-20. Our common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on the NYSE at the market open on April 22, 2019. Accordingly, all share amounts presented reflect the reverse stock split.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(5)
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(3)
 

  
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(2)
  
  
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
   
  
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  
  
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 

  
 All
Other
Stock
Awards
(#)(3)
 All
Other
Option
Awards
(#)(4)
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(5)
  
  
 All
Other
Stock
Awards
(#)(2)
 All
Other
Option
Awards
(#)
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(3)
Name
 Grant
Date
 Threshold
50% ($)
 Target
100% ($)
 Max
200%($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Max
(#)
 Grant
Date
 Date of
Board
Action
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Max
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Max
(#)

John T. Standley(6)

 7/17/2017 1,220,550 2,441,100 4,882,200 495,338 1,320,900 3,302,250 1,320,900   5,640,243 1/4/2019 12/6/2018 1,601,963 4,271,900 10,679,750    118,885   1,830,829

Kermit Crawford(5)

 10/2/2017 729,167 729,167 1,458,334    975,610 1,000,000 2.05 3,080,001

Darren W. Karst

 7/17/2017 518,906 1,037,813 2,075,625 134,775 359,400 898,500 359,400   1,534,638 

     1,220,550 2,441,100 4,882,200            

Kermit Crawford(4)

 1/4/2019 12/6/2018 1,115,625 2,975,000 7,437,500    82,790   1,274,966 

     875,000 1,750,000 3,500,000            

Darren W. Karst(5)

 1/4/2019 12/6/2018 558,300 1,488,800 3,722,000    41,435   638,099 

     531,719 1,063,438 2,126,875            

Bryan B. Everett

 7/17/2017 300,000 600,000 1,200,000 57,825 154,200 385,500 154,200   658,434  1/4/2019 12/6/2018 324,450 865,200 2,163,000    24,080   370,832 

 9/06/2017       400,000   968,000      309,000 618,000 1,236,000            

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

 7/17/2017 168,750 337,500 675,000 50,175 133,800 334,500 133,800   571,326  1/4/2019 12/6/2018 181,613 484,300 1,210,750    13,480   207,592 

Enio A. Montini, Jr.

 7/17/2017 180,540 361,080 722,160 58,613 156,300 390,750 156,300   667,401 

     172,969 345,938 691,875            

(1)
On January 4, 2019, each Named Executive Officer received a grant of cash-based performance units that will be earned based upon the achievement of an Adjusted EBITDA goal for fiscal years 2020 and 2021. Vesting for the performance units will occur, provided the performance targets have been met, on February 27, 2021 (the end of the Company's fiscal year 2021), provided that the Named Executive Officer is continuously employed at the Company through the date of the earnings release. The first amountsecond row of the table reflects the opportunity for each Named Executive Officer relates to the opportunity to earn an annual cash incentive bonus, as discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the caption "Cash Incentive Bonuses." Actual cash incentives earned for the fiscal year are shown in the Summary Compensation Table above.

(2)
On July 17, 2017, each Named Executive Officer (other than Mr. Crawford) received a grant of performance based units that will be earned based upon the achievement of an Adjusted EBITDA goal for fiscal yearsJanuary 4, 2019, and 2020. Vesting for the performance units will occur, provided the performance target has been met, on February 29, 2020 (the end of the Company's fiscal year 2020), provided that the Named Executive Officer is continuously employed at the Company through the date of the earnings release for fiscal year 2020.

(3)
On July 17, 2017, the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Crawford) received a grant of restricted stock, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, under the caption "Components of Executive Compensation for Fiscal Year 2018—2019—Restricted Stock,Stock." and on his October 2, 2017 start date, Mr. Crawford received 975,610 restricted shares. Mr. Everett also received an additional grant of restricted shares on September 6, 2017. These restricted shares will vest as follows based on continued employment:
Name
 Restricted
Shares
(#)
 Vesting Schedule

Mr. Standley

  1,320,900118,885 One-third on each of first three anniversaries of grant date

Mr. Crawford

  975,61082,790 One-third on each of first three anniversaries of grant date

Mr. Karst

  359,40041,435 One-third on each of first three anniversaries of grant date

Mr. Everett

  554,20024,080 One-third on each of first three anniversaries of grant date

Ms. Konrad

  133,800One-third on each of first three anniversaries of grant date

Mr. Montini

156,30013,480 One-third on each of first three anniversaries of grant date
(4)
On his October 2, 2017 start date, Mr. Crawford received 1,000,000 stock options that will vest in four equal annual installments.

(5)(3)
Represents the grant date fair value, measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of stock and option awards made in fiscal year 2018.2019. Grant date fair values are calculated pursuant to assumptions set forth in Note 1417 of the Company's 2019 Annual Report on Formform 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 26, 2018.25, 2019.

(4)
Mr. Crawford forfeited his 2019 plan based awards with his departure on March 12, 2019.

(5)
Mr. Karst forfeited his January 4, 2019 non-equity incentive plan award, a portion of his January 4, 2019 restricted stock grant, and is eligible for a prorated portion of any earned fiscal year 2020 annual cash incentive, pursuant to his March 12, 2019 separation agreement.

(6)
Mr. Standley will forfeit his January 4, 2019 non-equity incentive plan award and be eligible for a prorated portion of any earned fiscal year 2020 annual cash incentive upon his departure and pursuant to his March 12, 2019 separation agreement.

Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND SEPARATION AGREEMENTS

        Rite Aid has entered into employment agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers, which govern the material terms of which are described below.

        Term for Active Officers.    Except for Messrs. Karst, Montini and Crawford, whose terms commenced on August 20, 2014, February 15, 2010 and October 2, 2017, respectively, the term of each executive's employment commenced on the effective date of his or her employment agreement, as follows: Mr. Standley, September 24, 2008 (as amended and restated as of January 21, 2010); Mr. Everett, June 22, 2015; and Ms. Konrad, August 3, 2015. Each employment agreement has an initial term of two years, other than in the case of Messrs. Standley and Crawford, whose agreements have an initial term of three years (each such period, the "Initial Term"). Each agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year terms (each, a "Renewal Term"), unless either the executive or Rite Aid provides the other with notice of nonrenewal at least 180 days (120 days with respect to Messrs. Crawford and Everett) prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or a Renewal Term, as applicable.Company's last completed fiscal year.

        Salary and Incentive Bonus.    The respective agreements provide each executive with a base salary and an incentive compensation target (which may be reviewed periodically for increase by the Compensation Committee).

        Inducement Awards. As part of the announced leadership transition, Bryan Everett was promoted to Chief Operating Officer as of March 12, 2019. Effective as of March 12, 2019, Mr. Everett's annual base salary was increased to $750,000, Mr. Everett's target annual bonus opportunity was set at 125% of his base salary and his target long-term incentive compensation award opportunity was set at 250% of his base salary. Jocelyn Konrad was promoted to the position of Executive Vice President, Pharmacy & Retail Operations, effective March 12, 2019. In connection with the commencementthis promotion, Ms. Konrad's base salary was increased to $600,000, her target annual bonus opportunity was set at 100% of Mr. Crawford's employment, Mr. Crawford's employment agreement provides for grant on October 2, 2017base salary, and her target long-term incentive compensation award opportunity was set at 200% of $2,000,000 of restricted stock units that vest 1/3 annually on the anniversary date of the grant over a period of three years, 1,000,000 nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of our common stock which vest 1/4 annually on the anniversary date of the grant over a period of four years and $1,000,000 payable net of tax withholding within the first week of October 2, 2017.her base salary.

        Other Benefits.    Pursuant to their employment agreements, each of the Named Executive Officers is also entitled to participate in Rite Aid's welfare benefits, fringe benefit and perquisite programs, and savings plans.

        Term Under Active Employment Agreements.    The term of employment for each of Mr. Everett and Ms. Konrad commenced on the effective date of his or her employment agreement, as follows: Mr. Everett, June 22, 2015; and Ms. Konrad, August 3, 2015. The employment agreement for each of Mr. Everett and Ms. Konrad has an initial term of two years (each such period, the "Initial Term"). These agreements will automatically renew for successive one-year terms (each, a "Renewal Term"), unless either the executive or Rite Aid provides the other with a notice of nonrenewal at least 180 days, with respect to Ms. Konrad, and 120 days, with respect to Mr. Everett, prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or a Renewal Term, as applicable.

        Restrictive Covenants.    The employment agreement of each Named Executive Officer prohibits the officer from competing with Rite Aid during his or her employment period and for a period of one year thereafter.

        Termination and Change in Control Benefits.    The provisions of the employment agreements relating to termination of employment, and the terms of the separation agreements entered into with each of Messrs. Standley, Crawford, and Karst, are described under the caption "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" below.


Table of Contents


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR 20182019 YEAR-END

        The following table summarizes the number of securities underlying outstanding equity awards for the Named Executive Officers asOfficers. As previously announced, we implemented a reverse stock split of March 3, 2018:our common stock at a reverse stock split ratio of 1-for-20. Our common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on the NYSE at the market open on April 22, 2019. Accordingly, all share amounts and option exercise prices presented reflect the reverse stock split.


 Option Awards Stock Awards  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name
 Date of
Grant
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable(1)(2)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of
Shares
or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)(1)(4)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
# of
Unearned
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(1)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
  Date of
Grant
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable(1)(2)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of
Shares
or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)(1)(3)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(4)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
# of
Unearned
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(1)(5)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(4)
 

John T. Standley

 10/02/2008 168,800   0.89 10/2/2018      6/25/2009 29,030   24.80 6/25/2019     

 06/25/2009 580,600   1.24 06/25/2019      1/21/2010 127,750   30.40 1/21/2020     

 01/21/2010 2,555,000   1.52 01/21/2020      6/23/2010 71,430   21.40 6/23/2020     

 06/23/2010 1,428,600   1.07 06/23/2020      6/27/2011 118,079   24.80 6/27/2021     

 06/27/2011 2,361,585   1.24 06/27/2021      6/27/2011 70,175   24.80 6/27/2021     

 06/25/2012 1,403,500   1.24 06/27/2021      6/25/2012 68,965   26.40 6/25/2022     

 06/24/2013 1,379,300   1.32 06/25/2022      6/24/2013 46,815   55.20 6/24/2023     

 06/23/2014 936,300   2.76 06/24/2023      6/23/2014 33,925   141.60 6/23/2024     

 06/24/2015 508,875 169,625  7.08 06/23/2024      6/24/2015 21,349 7,116  173.60 6/24/2025     

 06/24/2015 284,650 284,650  8.68 06/24/2025 55,200 105,432    6/22/2016      6,385 93,221   

 06/22/2016     06/22/2026 255,400 487,814 383,100(5) 731,721  7/17/2017       44,030 642,838 66,045 964,257 

 07/17/2017     07/17/2027 1,320,900 2,522,919 1,320,900(6) 2,522,919  1/4/2019       118,885 1,735,721   

Kermit Crawford

 
10/2/2017
 
 
1,000,000
 
 
2.05
 
10/2/2027
 
975,610
 
1,863,415
 
 
  
10/2/2017
 
12,500
 
37,500
 
 
41.00
 
10/2/2027
 
32,520
 
474,796
 
 
 

 1/4/2019     1/4/2029 82,790 1,208,734   

Darren W. Karst

 
08/20/2014
 
155,850
 
51,950
 
 
6.43
 
08/20/2024
 
 
 
 
  
8/20/2014
 
10,390
 
 
 
128.60
 
8/20/2024
 
 
 
 
 

 06/24/2015 78,200 78,200  8.68 06/24/2025 15,166 28,967    6/24/2015 5,865 1,955  173.60 6/24/2025     

 06/22/2016      06/22/2026 69,866 133,444 104,800(5) 200,168  6/22/2016       1,747 25,501     

 07/17/2017     07/1/2027 359,400 686,454 359,400(6) 686,454  7/17/2017       11,980 174,908 17,970 262,362 

Bryan B. Everett

 
06/24/2015
 
33,400
 
33,400
 
 
8.68
 
06/24/2025
 
       

 1/4/2019       41,435 604,951   

Bryan Everett

 
6/24/2015
 
2,505
 
835
 
 
173.60
 
6/24/2025
 
 
 
 
 

 6/22/2016       747 10,901     

 06/22/2016      06/22/2026 29,866 57,044 44,800(5) 85,568  7/17/2017       5,140 75,044 7,710 112,566 

 07/17/2017     07/17/2027 154,200 294,522 154,200(6) 294,522  9/6/2017       13,333 194,666   

 09/6/2017     09/6/2027 400,000 764,000      1/4/2019       24,080 351,568   

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

 
06/25/2009
 
6,000
 
 
 
1.24
 
06/25/2019
 
 
 
 
  
6/25/2009
 
300
 
 
 
24.80
 
6/25/2019
 
 
 
 
 

 06/27/2011 33,100   1.24 06/27/2021      6/27/2011 1,655   24.80 6/27/2021     

 06/25/2012 33,800   1.32 06/25/2022      6/25/2012 1,690   26.40 6/25/2022     

 06/24/2013 13,500   2.76 06/24/2023      6/24/2013 675   55.20 6/24/2023     

 06/23/2014 4,950 1,650  7.08 06/23/2024      6/23/2014 330   141.60 6/23/2024     

 06/24/2015 5,800 5,800  8.68 06/24/2025      6/24/2015 435 145   173.60 6/24/2025     

 06/22/2016     06/22/2026 25,866 49,404 38,800(5) 74,108  6/22/2016       647 9,441     

 07/17/2017     07/17/2027 133,800 255,558 133,800(6) 255,558  7/17/2017       4,460 65,116 6,690 97,674 

Enio A. Montini, Jr.

 
06/25/2012
 
60,675
 
 
 
1.32
 
06/25/2022
 
 
 
 
 

 06/24/2013 59,750   2.76 06/24/2023      1/4/2019       13,480 196,808   

 06/23/2014 58,050   7.08 06/23/2024     

 06/24/2015 32,450   8.68 06/24/2025     

 06/22/2016      06/22/2026     

 07/17/2017     07/17/2027     

(1)
Refer to "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" below for circumstances under which the terms of the vesting of equity awards would be accelerated.

(2)
Stock options will generally vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date, based on continued employment. With respect to the restricted stock awards listed above, one-third of the restricted shares will vest on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, based on continued employment.

(3)
Restricted shares will generally vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

(4)
Determined with reference to $1.91,$14.60, the closing price of a share of Rite Aid common stock on the last trading day before March 3, 2018.

(4)
Restricted shares will generally vest one-third on each of2019 to reflect the first three anniversaries of the grant date.reverse stock split.

(5)
Performance units granted on June 22, 2016 will be earned based upon the achievement of an Adjusted EBITDA goal for fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019. Vesting for the performance units will occur, provided the performance target has been met, on March 2, 2019 (the end of the Company's fiscal year 2019), provided that the Named Executive Officer is continuously employed at the Company through the date of the earnings release for fiscal year 2019.

(6)
Performance units granted on July 17, 2017 will be earned based upon the achievement of an Adjusted EBITDA goaland Return on Net Assets goals for fiscal years 2019 and 2020. Vesting for the performance units will occur, provided the performance target has been met, on February 29, 2020 (the end of the Company's fiscal year 2020), provided that the Named Executive Officer is continuously employed at the Company through the date of the earnings release for fiscal year 2020.

Table of Contents


OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 20182019

        The following table summarizes for each Named Executive Officer the stock option exercises and shares vested during fiscal year 2018:2019. As previously announced, we implemented a reverse stock split of our common stock at a reverse stock split ratio of 1-for-20. Our common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on the NYSE at the market open on April 22, 2019. As the following information reports transactions that occurred during the fiscal year 2019, the number of shares and options disclosed are on a pre-reverse stock split basis. Any stock holdings resulting from the below transactions, as of April 22, 2019, have been adjusted for the reverse stock split accordingly.


 Option Awards Stock Awards  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name
 Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
 Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
 Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)
  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
 Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
 Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)
 

John T. Standley

   1,401,907 3,486,329  168,800 43,888 623,200 $1,104,759 

Kermit Crawford

        325,204 $373,985 

Darren W. Karst

   127,249 342,606    169,899 $301,266 

Bryan B. Everett

   14,934 45,997    199,667 $281,337 

Jocelyn Z. Konrad

   12,934 39,837    57,533 $100,607 

Enio A. Montini, Jr.

   29,167 96,174 


NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 20182019

        The following table sets forth the nonqualified deferred compensation activity for each Named Executive Officer during fiscal year 2018:2019:

Name
 Executive
Contributions in
Last FY ($)
 Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY ($)(2)
 Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)(2)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Forfeitures ($)
 Aggregate
Balance at Last
FYE ($)
  Executive
Contributions in
Last FY ($)
 Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY ($)(2)
 Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)(2)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Forfeitures ($)
 Aggregate
Balance at Last
FYE ($)
 

John T. Standley(1)

  290,769 414,049  3,790,099   292,932 176,028  4,259,058 

Kermit Crawford(1)

  80,000 20,153  100,153   240,000 (16,385)  323,768 

Darren W. Karst(1)

  198,030 68,365  794,283   203,360 (4,061)  993,583 

Bryan B. Everett(1)

  135,675 25,565  342,580   147,600 (11,488)  478,692 

Jocelyn Z. Konrad(1)

  101,200 44,184  436,328   110,250 1,066  547,644 

Enio A. Montini, Jr.(1)

  114,949 141,623  1,204,196 

(1)
Amounts shown relate to a defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan covering the Named Executive Officers.Officers in the fiscal year. Please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the caption "Post-Retirement Benefits" for a description of the material terms of this plan.

(2)
Amounts shown were reported to the extent required in the "All Other Compensation" column of the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2018.2019.


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

        As discussed above under the caption "Executive Employment Agreements," the Company has entered into employment agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers. Upon written notice, the employment agreement of each of the Named Executive Officers is terminable by either Rite Aid or the individual officer seeking termination. Since the end of the last completed fiscal year, the Company has entered into separation agreements with certain of our Named Executive Officers, which are discussed below, as applicable.


Table of Contents

Mr. John Standley

        Circumstances Resulting in Severance.    Pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company, if Mr. Standley ishad been terminated by the Company without "cause,""cause" or if he terminateshad terminated his employment for "good reason" (as such terms are defined in his employment agreement) or if the Company provides a notice of nonrenewal at least 180 days prior to the expiration of his employment agreement, a "Company Nonrenewal," and such Company Nonrenewal occurs within six months of a change in control,, then he will bewould have been entitled to receive:


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the separation agreement entered into on March 12, 2019, Mr. Standley will be entitled to the severance benefits described above under the caption "Circumstances Resulting in Severance" upon selection of his successor in the role of Chief Executive Officer and the termination of his employment.

        If Rite Aid terminateshad terminated Mr. Standley for "cause," or he terminateshad terminated his employment without "good reason":

        If Mr. Standley's employment ishad been terminated as a result of his death or "disability" (as such term is defined in his employment agreement), he (or his estate, as the case may be) will bewould have been entitled to receive all accrued but unpaid salary and benefits payable under death or disability benefit plans in which he participates, a pro-rata bonus (paid at the same time it is paid to other eligible participants in the bonus plan and based on actual achievement of performance targets for the fiscal year), continued health insurance (or reimbursement for the cost of such benefits) for two years for Mr. Standley and/or his or her immediate family, as applicable, vesting of all stock options, and vesting of an amount of restricted stock that would have vested had he remained employed for three years following the date of termination.

Mr. Kermit Crawford

        Mr. Kermit Crawford, former President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, departed the Company by mutual agreement pursuant to the leadership transition effectuated on March 12, 2019. The Separation Agreement with Mr. Crawford provides for a separation payment equal to $5,000,000 payable in equal installments over a 24 month period subject to executing a general release of claims in favor of the Company. Mr. Crawford was also relieved of his obligation to repay $520,073


Table of Contents

to the Company, which represents the repayment obligation with respect to the cash-based inducement award paid to Mr. Crawford upon his hire.

        Circumstances Resulting in Severance.    Pursuant to theirhis employment agreementsagreement with the Company, if either of Messrs. Karst andMr. Crawford ishad been terminated by Rite Aid without "cause" or if such officer'she had terminated his employment is terminated by the officer for "good reason" (as such terms are defined in the applicable employment agreement), then the officer will be entitled to receive:then:

Mr. Darren Karst

        Circumstances Resulting in Severance.    Pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company, if Mr. Karst had been terminated by Rite Aid without "cause" or if he were to terminate his employment for "good reason" (as such terms are defined in the employment agreement), then:

Pursuant to theirthe separation agreement entered into on March 12, 2019, Mr. Karst became entitled to the severance benefits described above under the caption "Circumstances Resulting in Severance" upon the termination of his transition period of employment agreementson May 31, 2019.

Mr. Bryan Everett

        Circumstances Resulting in Severance.    Pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company, if Mr. Everett or Ms. Konrad is terminated by Rite Aid without "cause" or if such officer'she terminates his employment is terminated by the officer for


Table of Contents

"good "good reason" (as such terms are defined in the applicable employment agreement), then the officerthen: